Re: [struts-chain] Some ideas

2003-11-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting BaTien Duong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [snip] > In fact, that is what we are attempting to do. For any atomic process, i > think there are 3 repeatable components: data collection, rule analysis > based on collected data, and desion based on the analysis. I am planning > to build these re-

Re: [struts-chain] Some ideas

2003-11-11 Thread BaTien Duong
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Konstantin Shaposhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Thank you for quick response and your ideas about the implementation. But can I ask you why I can't use the second approach with struts 1.1. I explore struts-chain code once again and found that I only need to ch

Re: [struts-chain] Some ideas

2003-11-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Konstantin Shaposhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thank you for quick response and your ideas about the > implementation. > > But can I ask you why I can't use the second > approach with struts 1.1. I explore struts-chain code once > again and found that I only need to change 1 Command in >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24235] - Secure html:link tag, plus module support.

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread David Graham
Vic, We are tired of your conspiracy theories, flames, gratuitous self-promotion, and generally poor behavior. Your conduct has been absurd and offensive to people that donate their valuable time to the ASF. Your actions on theserverside.com and the Jakarta general mailing list qualify, IMO, as g

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread Vic Cekvenich
Martin Cooper wrote: You've attacked ... Craig. Craig attacked me. All the while, you've been told that appropriate measures are being taken by the appropriate people I was not told that! Do you have a link? You can send a private mail if you'd like, not to fan the falmes. , but still you

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24631] New: - Struts tags use bytes of UTF-8 for urlencoding unconditionally

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread Martin Cooper
Vic, Just shut up. You've been whining on about this on general@, long after being told that it's the wrong place for that discussion. You've attacked Apache in general, the chairman specifically, and now Craig. All the while, you've been told that appropriate measures are being taken by the appro

Re: [struts-chain] Some ideas

2003-11-11 Thread Konstantin Shaposhnikov
Thank you for quick response and your ideas about the implementation. But can I ask you why I can't use the second approach with struts 1.1. I explore struts-chain code once again and found that I only need to change 1 Command in servlet-standard chain. And what means "provided for backwards co

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread Vic Cekvenich
This is what broke it: http://theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=22337 It was aleged that code was takem from someplace that was not allowing it and placing it into Apache code base! ASF seems to be saying "we took the design and are re-implementing it. Whatever. Shame on you for ... a

Re: [struts-chain] Some ideas

2003-11-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Konstantin Shaposhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello all. > > If I understand corretly struts-chain package is used for > modelling struts RequestProcessor using jakarta-commons chain library. > That is definitely *one* use case for the chain of responsibility pattern. > When I've had

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Was that called for Craig? Yep. > Maybe putting in the4 context of ... ASF was accused of stealing > designs, and Vic decided to presure ASF? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40jakarta.apache.org/msg08432.html > Feel free to go make your ca

[struts-chain] Some ideas

2003-11-11 Thread Konstantin Shaposhnikov
Hello all. If I understand corretly struts-chain package is used for modelling struts RequestProcessor using jakarta-commons chain library. When I've had heard this name I actually thought that this package is for composing struts actions as chain of commands and was very surprised when I found s

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces build.xml

2003-11-11 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc2003/11/11 13:33:47 Modified:contrib/struts-faces build.xml Log: Oops, this update is not ready to check in yet. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +4 -131jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread Vic Cekvenich
Was that called for Craig? Maybe putting in the4 context of ... ASF was accused of stealing designs, and Vic decided to presure ASF? http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40jakarta.apache.org/msg08432.html Vic Cekvenich of BaseBeans.com has made it clear in public postings that he is ashamed

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources archives.xml consultants.xml powered.xml sigs.xml

2003-11-11 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc2003/11/11 13:23:32 Modified:contrib/struts-faces build.xml doc learning.xml using.xml doc/faqs kickstart.xml doc/news news_2001.xml news_2002_q2.xml news_2002_q3.xml news_2002_q4.xml news_2003_q1.xml news_

Re: Suggestion: way to execute code after form.validate(mapping, request) fails, but before forward to input

2003-11-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
"Gupta, Sahil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that Mike is talking about the case where he uses the validation fwk. > There is no way, what he is asking for can be done with the current > implementation(but for implementing the processValidate in your own RP) of > the RP but i think that th

RE: Suggestion: way to execute code after form.validate(mapping, request) fails, but before forward to input

2003-11-11 Thread Gupta, Sahil
I think that Mike is talking about the case where he uses the validation fwk. There is no way, what he is asking for can be done with the current implementation(but for implementing the processValidate in your own RP) of the RP but i think that this should be a nice addition to the future implemen

RE: Suggestion: way to execute code after form.validate(mapping, request) fails, but before forward to input

2003-11-11 Thread Carlos Fernandez
you can go thru the list of errors by name, by iterating on ActionErrors.properties property. -Carlos. -Original Message- From: Kakunje, Chidananda (B.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:13 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: Suggestion: way to execute

RE: Suggestion: way to execute code after form.validate(mapping, request) fails, but before forward to input

2003-11-11 Thread Kakunje, Chidananda (B.)
ActionErrors is a collection. So once the processValidate() is called, you can check any errors present in the collection and take action accordingly, before forwarding in your Action class. --Chida -Original Message- From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, Nove

Re: Suggestion: way to execute code after form.validate(mapping, request) fails, but before forward to input

2003-11-11 Thread David Graham
--- Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using Struts 1.1. > > I want to execute code only if validation fails, but before the forward > to > the input action. > Unfortunately, it seems that RequestProcessor.processValidate() has > tightly-coupled these two activities, leaving no

Suggestion: way to execute code after form.validate(mapping, request) fails, but before forward to input

2003-11-11 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I'm using Struts 1.1. I want to execute code only if validation fails, but before the forward to the input action. Unfortunately, it seems that RequestProcessor.processValidate() has tightly-coupled these two activities, leaving no way for such activity to be triggered. At first, I thought I c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24608] - Enhance BaseFieldTag - refactor value attribute retrieval

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24608] - Enhance BaseFieldTag - refactor value attribute retrieval

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24612] - The "collection" attribute of the tag does not lookup the object in the specified scope

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24612] New: - The "collection" attribute of the tag does not lookup the object in the specified scope

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24608] - Enhance BaseFieldTag - refactor value attribute retrieval

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24608] New: - Enhance BaseFieldTag - refactor value attribute retrieval

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22991] - Add format and formatKey attributes to html tags

2003-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu