DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22991.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24608.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24608.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24608.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24608.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm using Struts 1.1.
I want to execute code only if validation fails, but before the forward to
the input action.
Unfortunately, it seems that RequestProcessor.processValidate() has
tightly-coupled these two activities, leaving no way for such activity to be
triggered.
At first, I thought I
--- Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using Struts 1.1.
I want to execute code only if validation fails, but before the forward
to
the input action.
Unfortunately, it seems that RequestProcessor.processValidate() has
tightly-coupled these two activities, leaving no way for
ActionErrors is a collection. So once the processValidate() is called, you can check
any errors present in the collection and take action accordingly, before forwarding in
your Action class.
--Chida
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
you can go thru the list of errors by name, by iterating on
ActionErrors.properties property.
-Carlos.
-Original Message-
From: Kakunje, Chidananda (B.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:13 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Suggestion: way to execute
Gupta, Sahil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that Mike is talking about the case where he uses the validation
fwk.
There is no way, what he is asking for can be done with the current
implementation(but for implementing the processValidate in your own RP) of
the RP but i think that this
craigmcc2003/11/11 13:23:32
Modified:contrib/struts-faces build.xml
doc learning.xml using.xml
doc/faqs kickstart.xml
doc/news news_2001.xml news_2002_q2.xml news_2002_q3.xml
news_2002_q4.xml news_2003_q1.xml
Was that called for Craig?
Maybe putting in the4 context of ... ASF was accused of stealing
designs, and Vic decided to presure ASF?
http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40jakarta.apache.org/msg08432.html
Vic Cekvenich of BaseBeans.com has made it clear in public postings that
he is ashamed
craigmcc2003/11/11 13:33:47
Modified:contrib/struts-faces build.xml
Log:
Oops, this update is not ready to check in yet.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +4 -131jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Hello all.
If I understand corretly struts-chain package is used for
modelling struts RequestProcessor using jakarta-commons chain library.
When I've had heard this name I actually thought that this
package is for composing struts actions as chain of commands
and was very surprised when I found
Quoting Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Was that called for Craig?
Yep.
Maybe putting in the4 context of ... ASF was accused of stealing
designs, and Vic decided to presure ASF?
http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40jakarta.apache.org/msg08432.html
Feel free to go make your case on
Quoting Konstantin Shaposhnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all.
If I understand corretly struts-chain package is used for
modelling struts RequestProcessor using jakarta-commons chain library.
That is definitely *one* use case for the chain of responsibility pattern.
When I've had heard
This is what broke it:
http://theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=22337
It was aleged that code was takem from someplace that was not allowing
it and placing it into Apache code base! ASF seems to be saying we took
the design and are re-implementing it.
Whatever.
Shame on you for ...
Thank you for quick response and your ideas about the
implementation.
But can I ask you why I can't use the second
approach with struts 1.1. I explore struts-chain code once
again and found that I only need to change 1 Command in
servlet-standard chain.
And what means provided for backwards
Vic,
Just shut up. You've been whining on about this on general@, long after
being told that it's the wrong place for that discussion. You've attacked
Apache in general, the chairman specifically, and now Craig. All the
while, you've been told that appropriate measures are being taken by the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Martin Cooper wrote:
You've attacked SNIP
... Craig.
Craig attacked me.
All the
while, you've been told that appropriate measures are being taken by the
appropriate people
I was not told that! Do you have a link? You can send a private mail if
you'd like, not to fan the falmes.
, but still
Vic,
We are tired of your conspiracy theories, flames, gratuitous
self-promotion, and generally poor behavior. Your conduct has been absurd
and offensive to people that donate their valuable time to the ASF. Your
actions on theserverside.com and the Jakarta general mailing list qualify,
IMO, as
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24235.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Quoting Konstantin Shaposhnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for quick response and your ideas about the
implementation.
But can I ask you why I can't use the second
approach with struts 1.1. I explore struts-chain code once
again and found that I only need to change 1 Command in
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Quoting Konstantin Shaposhnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for quick response and your ideas about the
implementation.
But can I ask you why I can't use the second
approach with struts 1.1. I explore struts-chain code once
again and found that I only need to
Quoting BaTien Duong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
In fact, that is what we are attempting to do. For any atomic process, i
think there are 3 repeatable components: data collection, rule analysis
based on collected data, and desion based on the analysis. I am planning
to build these
28 matches
Mail list logo
