Re: Develop against released commons versions [WAS: RE: string concatenation]

2004-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Ted Husted wrote: > Yes, there lies the rub: If we were to submit a patch to commons-lang today, we > could not roll a (potentially) GA-quality release tomorrow. At least not without > also rolling a release of commons-lang and waiting for it to "go platinum" first. > > My s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26942] - Parse error using for in struts-cfg.xml

2004-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26942] - Parse error using for in struts-cfg.xml

2004-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/impl ModuleConfigImpl.java

2004-02-16 Thread martinc
martinc 2004/02/16 21:51:48 Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd src/share/org/apache/struts/config ConfigRuleSet.java ModuleConfig.java src/share/org/apache/struts/config/impl ModuleConfigImpl.java Log:

Re: string concatenation

2004-02-16 Thread David H. DeWolf
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: -1. The commons-collections folks screwed much of the world (although not us, because we only depend on a couple of classes that weren't moved to new packages without backwards compatible deprecations) with their recent backwards incompatible changes. I'm not intereste

Re: Develop against released commons versions [WAS: RE: string concatenation]

2004-02-16 Thread Ted Husted
Yes, there lies the rub: If we were to submit a patch to commons-lang today, we could not roll a (potentially) GA-quality release tomorrow. At least not without also rolling a release of commons-lang and waiting for it to "go platinum" first. My suggestion would be that we start using "bridge pa

RE: string concatenation

2004-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 11:46 PM > To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: string concatenation > > > Quoting Andrew Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > It seems like utter madness to me.

RE: string concatenation

2004-02-16 Thread Andrew Hill
where some webapps need the old version of commons-collections.jar and some need the new version. Oh. I thought it would use the one in WEB-INF/lib. Why doesnt it? :-( I mean strewth mate , its bad enough having to play silly buggers with the xml parsers. I didnt realise that applied to commons