RE: Custom JSP Tags and Validator

2001-07-05 Thread Cook, Levi
-Original Message- From: David Winterfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 10:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Custom JSP Tags and Validator I have couple of issues with the best way to handle the possible incorporation of the validator custom JSP

RE: custom tag as attribute of another custom tag

2001-07-02 Thread Cook, Levi
This is quite true-- For more information on why its this way, you might want to download and review the JSP specification from here: http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/download.html Regards, Levi Cook -Original Message- From: Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: server-side, java-based validation rules for struts..

2001-06-25 Thread Cook, Levi
My intent was to mention that property editor's are an option, quite possibly an option I would employ. Another option I see as being quite reasonable is storing configuration info. in an DBMS, so that I can edit through a web browser. This might very well take the form of a date validating

RE: Struts 1.1 TODO List -- Event and Listener Model

2001-06-22 Thread Cook, Levi
Ahhh, now I follow what you were saying. I think both event dispatching mechanisms exist becuase they provide support for semantically separate issues. The first form is notification that something interesting just happened. The second form is the prevention of placing an object into an invalid

RE: server-side, java-based validation rules for struts..

2001-06-21 Thread Cook, Levi
comments below... -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: server-side, java-based validation rules for struts.. So at some point you will gat a handle to the ActionForm (read bean)

RE: server-side, java-based validation rules for struts..

2001-06-21 Thread Cook, Levi
Hi David, I would like to emphasize that I truly do not intend to criticize or belittle your work. I really do appreciate and respect your efforts to give Struts a boost. My only agenda is simply trying to expand the flexibility of our tools and enhance there ability to be learned and reused.

RE: server-side, java-based validation rules for struts..

2001-06-20 Thread Cook, Levi
I'm guessing my aforementioned ideas on validation fall into one of the following categories: 1. its was a really bad idea, not worth commenting or elaborating on 2. i didn't provide a clearly articulated idea to review 3. they're fine and everyone's really busy, and i'm impatient I'll

RE: server-side, java-based validation rules for struts..

2001-06-20 Thread Cook, Levi
Hi All, Thanks for the replies, I now feel less lost in the ether :) You each brought up excellent points which I believe are address-able. Ultimately, I guess a working example sounds best for exploring these ideas.. I'll try to post something back over the weekend on this. Until then, I'll

RE: struts-config_1_0.dtd location when not connected to internet

2001-03-30 Thread Cook, Levi
Does using the local DTD require the DOCTYPE declaration to be modified?? Thanks in advance, Levi Cook -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 11:19 AM To: Struts-Dev@Jakarta. Apache. Org (E-mail) Subject: Re:

RE: development issues

2001-03-27 Thread Cook, Levi
Title: RE: development issues Surely I'm reiterating the obvious here, but Javascript alone cannot/should not be relied upon for validation. It does play a useful and important role, however its scope should normally be limited to improving the users experience with supplying input that our