> > First let's be very clear.
> >
> > It's *not* about "market share".
>
> I have to disagree with you on this one. Struts is
> the defacto standard because of its market share.
Why does Struts need to be defacto standard?
Struts in itself has no value, IMHO.
Obviously Struts developers have
> public int doStartTag() throws JspException {
> int tempValue = super.doStartTag();
>StringBuffer href = new StringBuffer("some stuff");
> ResponseUtils.write(pageContext, sb.toString());
> return tempValue;
> }
>
> This all works fine for me!
So you're doi
> Can somebody tell me which is the best way to do this?
Oh boy :)
There was a long discussion not so long ago about
the problems with extending the tags (not limited
to the Struts tags, btw) on this list.
You're stuck with copy-and-pasteing TextTag.doStartTag()
into your new tag, then sprinklin
> I agree totally, at the level were currenrly arguing,
> I dare anyone to disagree !
>
> A good way to tackle this is Use Case by Use Case, to
> avoid talking in general terms.
>
> 1) What specific tags have you or do you want to modify the
> behaviour of.
Well, this is the thing...how would I
> > From what I've seen most custom tags seem to have been
> > implemented as one big doStartTag() or doEndTag(). The
> > entire implementation of the tag is in that one method.
>
> I have worked to move most of the code out of doStartTag()
> and doEndTag() for many tags. My pattern has been to
[this is in response to Robert Leland's reply to my
post on the struts-user list griping about the
(un)extensibility of custom tags]
> >My #1 pet peeve about custom taglibs are that almost
> >none of them have been designed with extensibility in
> >mind. This includes all the Struts tags that I'
> Does anyone know of a NYC area Struts user group?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/struts_NYC/
-TPP
-
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s). Any review, use
> the patch is here:
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18002
This one needs to be in a 1.1 release.
-TPP
-
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recip
> http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=20655
> A good paper on performance, but implies that Struts
> reflection is slow.
>
> I disagree, but.. would not mind converting some of the
> Struts to CGLib, if there is a comiter who would review
> and integrate, should it come on age
> I wouldn't call this a bug (a very annoying feature, at
> least for me), but from reading the javadoc for the
> DispatchAction.unspecified() method, it looks like the
> method was added in later to allow application developers
> to create their own default behavior when the dispatch
> parameter i
Anyone know why the error handling is different in these
two Action classes when the parameter is missing from
the request?
DispatchAction calls the unspecified() method, but
LookupDispatchAction throws an exception that can not
be caught in the application.
Why isn't LookupDispatchAction calling
> And IDEA may be the best developer's UI ever invented.
Ted, would you mind comparing IDEA to Eclipse a little
bit, if you have time? Not a full blown feature-by-feature
review, just highlights.
I've historically always been restricted to whatever
my employer gives me (which has usually been JBu
> >so perhaps we will succeed in converting the dinosaurs
> to Struts :-)
>
> It's already happening. I'm teaching corporate mainframe
> programmers how to move into the Java world using
> WebSphere Studio Application Developer (WSAD) for
> serious companies in/near Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
