n't
need a transformation to get our tlds, but we could transform the tld itself
to generate our docs. It seems to me that everyone could benefit from this,
too, not just us Struts folks.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
An update for -dev folks: Erich's post made it to -user, where I've been
updating on progress. Both problems he found have now been fixed, as of the
8/1 nightly build (one in Struts and one in Commons FileUpload).
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Cra
Sounds like a good idea to me. However, rather than submitting an updated
copy of the DTD, what I would suggest is that you open a bug report at
Bugzilla, and add a patch as an attachment. The process is described here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/bugs.html
Thanks!
--
Martin Cooper
Corrected link:
http://www.objectventure.com/products/objectassembler.html
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:20 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: XML Config: viewpoints
ruts/userGuide/release-notes.html
and make sure that all their post-b1 changes have been included.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:53 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Nightly builds and Commons FileUpload
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
ile.
--
Martin Cooper
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: 7/23/2002 6:21 PM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action
ActionServlet.java
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 17:
eat it as false)?
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 5:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action
> ActionServlet.java
>
RT and EL taglibs:
http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg05792.html
As a recap, the reasons I prefer this approach are:
a) We can make any attribute that can accept an RT expr today accept an EL
expr. This will give us more flexible EL-enabled tags while not confusing
the u
lease? You might also want to set your umask to 002 in
your .cshrc file so that this will happen automatically next time.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
ervlets 2.3 container? Or
are the tests not going to hit those kinds of issues anyway? (I can't say
I've looked at Cactus or the Cactus tests too closely at this point.)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Running "ant test.tomcat.all" will run the Cactus based tests
> against both
&
This change undoes a change made by Craig to fix Bugzilla #10534 last
Sunday. It looks like we need a different way to fix both Bugzilla #10534
and Tiles...
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10,
Comments, please?
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
r
just for backwards compatibility, or should we make them log to the local
logging instance instead (or just leave them alone)?
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sigh. I *thought* I was using 20020706, but it turns out I was actually
using the 1.3 release. I need to 'clean' more often...
It's working now.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, Ju
askdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRu
nner.java:231)
[junit] at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestR
unner.java:409)
I have the 20020706 nightly BeanUtils (but I've tried with the release
version as well).
Any ideas on what
ch so that
the action form is correctly populated when the next request is submitted.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ActionForm initializa
in, this time to /module/page.jsp.
Well, this suggests an interesting alternative to using a prefix for the
default sub-app, knowing that the fact that no such sub-app is defined will
cause the request to be sent to the default sub-app anyway... ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> =:0) Just kid
x27;input' of an Action)
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:03:23 -0700
> > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 'Struts
ight show up in the config file as:
/WEB-INF/modules/$MODULE$/pages/foo.jsp
and computeURL would replace '$MODULE$' with 'module1'.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 200
. We can always mark them LATER if we don't get to them right away, but
at least the issues will be logged.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:23 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subje
Whoops! Right message, wrong place...
This is a fix for Bugzilla #10363.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action
> Acti
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:45 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> >
d to
reset property values between uses of a tag instance. Or would this be too
drastic a change for now?
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
already exists. With a Map, the new one will
overwrite the old one, whereas with a Set, the old one will remain, and the
second add will be ignored. In this particular case, I don't believe this
matters to us.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto
release, when it happens.
I'd be interested in hearing if you have particular ideas about what the XML
DTD/schema should look like - but further discussion of this should really
happen on the commons-dev list, rather than here.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Jam
+1
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Proposed Committer James Holmes
>
>
> James is a longstanding member of the Strut
ould do the trick.
Don't know about the second issue. Can you elaborate on the problem a bit?
We use a proxy server here at work, but I've never had problems with query
strings.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
ey can be productive in developing Struts
apps the way they were intended to be built. And they don't have to learn
anything about complex design patterns along the way. (By the way, it's my
experience that people are much more likely to buy into a particular design
when they understand *wh
about, and
why it, and hence Struts, was a good idea for the size of project we were
undertaking. With appropriate assignment of tasks, every one of them was
productive throughout the project, and most of them still know next to
nothing about "complex design patterns". The app, by the way, h
glean much more from
scanning a FAQ than I would do by searching for something. (But then perhaps
that's just because I don't seem to be too good at formulating the right
queries. :)
Thanks for volunteering to moderate, Ted.
--
Martin Cooper
-Original Message-
From: Ted Hust
n sites.
3) We might also want to provide a recommended textual credit (i.e. a bit
stronger than an "e.g.") for people to use.
4) We use the "Powered by Struts" logo on the Struts web site, but the site
isn't actually powered by Struts... Should we remove it?
--
Martin Coop
list, rather than on
struts-dev, since there are many more people there who might be able to help
you.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "vivek shrivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 9:13 PM
Subject: Preser
That may have been true for EA2, but the JSTL PFD (and the Beta 2 RI) no
longer have the tag. There is only the tag, which does
not define a scripting variable.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers Li
r actions "agree" on some other location from which they can
obtain their form bean, rather than using the one that Struts will pass to
your execute() method.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Terrence Xavier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bugzilla and attach your
patch to it? That will ensure that we don't lose track of it.
Thanks.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Hal Deadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday,
t how
to make it work. :)
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Andre Beskrowni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: Problems with multi-app config
> i'm trying to get this feature to
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: Servlet 2.3 filter
>
>
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>
. If that distinction is not necessary,
then an int can be used. In other words, if Integer can provide more
functionality than int, then why not expose that additional functionality,
rather than "dumbing down" the use of Integer?
Then again, if I can configure conversion failure to return null
ilter-based solution to
this problem. However, there are still solutions available to us under
Servlets 2.3, even if they may seem less than ideal.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL
xample
in which this breaks is where some action needs to be taken in addition to
displaying the JSP page, and there is no one-to-one relationship between the
action and the page. (In Struts-land, this is the equivalent of having
multiple actions which may forward to the same JSP page.)
Kevin realises
t the end of your execute() method, instead of making the typical call to
mapping.findForward(). This approach has the advantage that composeForward()
can take advantage of any logical forwards you have defined for the action,
so that those forwards can be used to provide the base name for JSP page
e to combine the use of both the EL and
RTexpr values for each tag instance (if they wanted to use the EL at all,
that is).
I actually think that addressing this would head us down the same path that
I believe the JSTL EG followed in their disc
there may be a
problem with the dependencies. This is the build that generates the
binaries you are looking for.
--
Martin Cooper
At 01:43 PM 4/4/02, Steve Wilkinson wrote:
>I'm really confused (not hard these days...)
>
>gump says the struts nightly build succeeded, however, th
think we should allow the user to choose. It would be confusing to
the user, and also to us when trying to track down problems and subtle
differences in behaviour.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "David Winterfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Devel
would be
keys into that Map.
Then again, even if it works, this is quite likely over-engineering for this
situation...
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "David Winterfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
folks there.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: JakartaOne: The Gathering
> OK, we need to make a de
o I'm not sure where
to go from here. Hopefully someone who has more class loader knowledge than
I do can chip in now...
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Cedric Dumoulin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTEC
ck somehow.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions
SwitchA
esn't have default resources of its own?
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:42 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions
SwitchAction.java Local
I picked up this fix, since it seemed rather important, so it's included in
Beta 1.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Arron Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:35
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Beta 1 update
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> &
roup write access, I can make
the change. Thanks.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: Beta 1 update
> +1,
e release is out, the
code base will be opened up again to enhancements and other changes.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Just curious.
>
> Arron.
>
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> >First of all, I sincerely apologise to you all for the length of time it
is
> >taking to ge
beta release process in one phase this
time, to avoid a repeat of the current situation.
Is everyone OK with this approach?
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OK, I've picked up this change for Beta 1. I've also picked up your later
commit, fixing a config file problem, and one of my own, fixing a similar
problem. It's not a good sign to release a beta in which we don't have our
own example config files right. ;-)
--
Martin Coo
FYI, the CVS tree has been tagged for the Beta 1 release. It may be a day,
or perhaps more, until I can push the official notice out, which is why I'm
letting struts-dev know in advance.
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional comma
the Struts 1.0.x
builds include them.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Suneet Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: Building Struts From Source
I am trying to build struts from the source in a
You would do much better asking this question on the struts-user list, where
there are many more people who might be able to help you.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "c tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
You would do much better asking this question on the struts-user list, where
there are many more people who might be able to help you.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Sachin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:
Ack. I hadn't realised it was a JSP 1.2 feature when I made the change. ;-(
The main part of the change, though, was to avoid catching things we didn't
mean to catch, since that has been biting me lately. I'll fix the fix so
that we still do that, but in a JSP 1.1 compliant man
the sandbox and released,
so that we can use it for Struts 1.1, or should we leave that for a later
release?
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 9:39 PM
Subject: Pr
is logging-implementation-dependent. Suggestions appreciated. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
include a reason).
--
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Another developer here submitted a patch to which
> adds support for iterating over arrays of primitives (Bug 6553). A
> third submitted a patch to to support a "forward"
> attribute. (I don't think that's made it into Bugzilla yet.)
For the iterate issue, y
working on my "day job" until 11:30 last night.
Over the last month or so, that hasn't been entirely uncommon. It doesn't
leave a whole lot of time for working on Struts, but I do my best to follow
up with bugs as much as I can. As you said, this is an open source project.
T
I just committed the fix as described.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: cvs commit:
jakarta-st
that
the tag handlers can be reused successfully in containers that do that.
I'm going to make a change so that a local variable is used within
formatValue(), instead of formatStr being used directly. That will avoid the
whole issue.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> diff -w -r1.18 WriteT
tag.
It seems to me that we should just make formatStr local to formatValue() and
be done with it. If you have a chance (it must be getting a bit late over
there now!), could you give that a quick try, and let me know the result? I
can check in the change.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message
g either. This would be a
cleaner fix, too.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Oleg V
Alexeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2
the first
and subsequent uses of the tag. Let me know if you'd like me to make that
change, Oleg.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Oleg V Alexeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06,
Interesting. This should not make a difference unless there is another bug
involved (either in the tag or the container). What were the symptoms
involved here, and which container was being used?
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
mitters, please let me know what you would like me to do in this respect.
--
Martin Cooper
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and suggestions are welcome.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: struts 1.1 doc (UserGuide: 2.6 accessing
I'm OK with that. A number of upload bugs have been outstanding for some
time now, and I'd certainly like to see them in the 1.1 beta. I'm sure other
people would, too.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "SCHACHTER,MICHAEL (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <[E
, for this and for Mike's
upload fixes, if that's what you'd like to do. It'll give me a little more
time anyway...
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL P
, so I, for one, would be happy if we selected that terminology
for Struts itself. ;-) (At one point, we were calling them plug-ins within
my team at work. I'm glad we didn't stick with that, since Craig has
recently introduced to Struts a different feature with that name!)
--
Martin Coop
The core workflow development is happening in Jakarta Commons, so you might
want to take a look at what's happening over there.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002
need (in my "day
job") to develop a multi-module application based on a hierarchical model.
Much of the framework is already in place, but it's not sufficiently general
at this point to contribute back to Struts. Hopefully, I'll be able to do
that at some point.
--
Martin Coo
ure
that this would be an enhancement of ForwardAction. It seems like a
different action, to me.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Laine Donlan (DEV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:09 AM
Subject: [Str
nightly build.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: Possible bug in multi app code - Can Ted or Craig respond?
> This message uses a character set that is not s
t know what the timeline is for progress on that.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Ditlinger, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:22 PM
Subject: Plug in services
>
>
> We&#x
like to get in, on the top of which is the customisation
of action mappings (which I'd really like some feedback on, if you have a
sec!).
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
would fit well with the new multi-module architecture. Bugzilla #6583 also
seems to argue for this.
Before I start making changes in this direction, I'd really like to hear
about how we got to where we are. The last thing I want to do is repeat the
same old mistakes!
Thanks.
--
Martin Coope
t let
me know exactly what you need.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Arron Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/exerc
Try this link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg04372.html
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Tim W Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: Struts vs. Java Face
@jakarta.apache.org/msg03680.html
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:31 AM
Subject: PropertyUtils with added PropertyEditor support
&
Yes, I can do the release manager thing. I'd appreciate some help with the
release notes, though. Would you be up for that, Ted?
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTEC
rence each Commons jar file
independently, since they'll be in their own locations. This is what we did
before.
I have a fix in the works for this, but I can't promise to get it in before
the next Gump failure message...
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "
viding a patch. (I can let you know when I'm done, if
you like.)
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:49 AM
Subject: XHTML-compliant tags
> Just wanted
has happened for a while.
If you have the time and inclination, feel free to take a look at what's
there and propose additions and/or changes (on the commons-dev list). If you
can post patches, I'll see what I can do about applying them.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
This type of question is better asked on the struts-user mailing list, where
there are many more people who might be able to assist you.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:37 AM
Sub
This type of question is better asked on the struts-user mailing list, where
there are many more people who might be able to assist you.
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 10:42 PM
Subject
te cycle, and put a final release into the marketplace more
> quickly.
Well, as I'm sure you've figured out if you've read this far :-) , I'm in
favour of completing Struts 1.1 with the new multi-app support, rather than
pushing it off to a later release.
As I mentioned ear
could take a look at what's going on in Commons and
perhaps contribute your work there in such a way that Struts users (amongst
others) could make use of the end result.
Thanks!
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
formatting. The headings are gone, as are the table
structure and the indications of who has volunteered to help with what.
These points aside, I'm seeing big improvements!
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Strut
lease.
Also, since I happened to have just built up a list of doc bugs to fix (but
hadn't started on them), I notice that there are also 6318 and 5991. It
looks like you may have fixed 6318, but I didn't see Bugzilla updates for
either, so I just wanted to mention them, while you'
I'm a bit puzzled as to what happened as well. Somewhere along the line,
the Javadoc link reverted to the nightly builds too.
In any case, I'm +1 on your proposed changes.
--
Martin Cooper
At 04:14 AM 2/15/02, Ted Husted wrote:
>I'm not exactly sure what happened there, b
401 - 500 of 682 matches
Mail list logo
