Date: 2004-03-24T17:28:42
Editor: 202.118.6.200 <>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: AbandonedPages
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/AbandonedPages
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -1,4 +1 @@
-##language:en
Thanks Joe. The little problem I'm having is that there isn't really a way to
initialize the reference to the value object. In other words, how to get the property
to reference the value object fetched by the Action. It's no big deal. Now that I
realize that it's not part of the philsophy of th
(I'm not proposing autopopulating anything -- the Action has to fetch the value object
anyway. I just want to reference it directly using syntax like valueObject.name from
my form tags... This *avoids* aupopulating or having to synchronize any object since
the ActionForm just references the val
Thanks for the nice reply.
I wouldn't think of it as Struts dictating the structure of the value object. In
practice, when a user is editing something, the thing almost always corresponds to an
object. That's the way the objects were modeled in the first place -- by doing
use-case analysis, et
Thank you for your thorough response.
Point of clarification: I'm talking about having the data available to some form found
in the view being forwarded to. This is not the form being passed *to* the action. In
other words, the Action sees the query data from the URL that got us to the action.
I've read several topics debating this. These discussiosn leave the issue ambiguous.
I've written couple of notes in "struts-user," but received no response. This makes me
think it's an architectural issue, perhaps best addressed in this forum.
What I want to be able to do is described in my to
You state:
> The ActionForm contains a *proposed*
> state change to the model or one of
> its beans. As Web developers, it's
> our job to confirm that the state
> change is reasonable (validate the
> input) and ~then~ update the model.
Using a value object would be a standard way of handling
Im posting this question to the dev group, because Im not that many are using the
multiple bundle support of 1.1 yet. Ive noticed that several of the methods for
getting access to the Servlet and thus the ServletContext have been removed from
classes like ApplicationConfig. This has made it
Anyone know why the DTD doesn't specify a roles attribute for the action mapping, but
the processRoles() method in the RequestProcessor is checking the ActionMapping for
every request to see if the roleNames field contains roles loaded from the
struts-config? I also see that the ActionConfig su
Martin,
I have two quick questions relating to this. First, do you think that this is the
way that multi-modules (sub-apps) will stay for the beta/1.1 release? That is, that a
sub-app will be somewhat limited in how it can reference actions in other sub-apps,
similar to the problem that Lain
I have been working on setting up a multi-app application by using multiple config/
init-param elements and struts configuration files. It seems to me that there is a
small problem in the RequestUtils class when a request URI is used to locate the
proper sub-application so that an ApplicatonCon
I'm wondering if this has anything to do with the bug that I reported a couple of
nights ago #6646. I should have probably mentioned that I was configuring the message
resource through the default struts-config and didn't have an "application" init-param
in the web.xml. This is how I think 1.1
Sorry to post a bug here, but the bug database is down right now and I wanted to let
someone know. I've been working on getting everything working on 1.1 and I think I
found something wrong in the ConfigRuleSet as it relates to the message-resources
element. Here is a section of the file starti
13 matches
Mail list logo
