Re: Module path-mapping limitation

It's not so much a bug as a design flaw. The current approach to prepending the module is under-designed and just jams it in. Though, I keep meaning to check whether the template feature we added later ($M$P) could be used to get around this somehow. -Ted. 12/17/2002 12:22:39 PM, Matt Raible

RE: Module path-mapping limitation

sary. Thanks, Matt > -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:19 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Module path-mapping limitation > > > > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matt Raible wrote: > > &

Re: Module path-mapping limitation

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matt Raible wrote: > Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing) for the limitation > that modules can only be used with extension-mapping (*.do) rather than > path-mapping (/do/*)? I don't see a bug report for that in Bugzilla, so feel free to submit an enhancement

Module path-mapping limitation

Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing) for the limitation that modules can only be used with extension-mapping (*.do) rather than path-mapping (/do/*)? If this has been fixed, please let me know. Matt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands