Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Hatcher
Eddie and others - that change did the trick. I'm now back in business with Cactus tests! Many thanks. I'll keep the issue open with the Cactus folks and I very well could be doing something strange in my test case configuration as well, but at least Struts is still happy and now I'm happy!

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-29 Thread Erik Hatcher
I'm still not having any luck with this issue (now at the 20021029 build). I've been toying with the request.setURL call in a Cactus beginXXX method, but that has no effect at all on this even though I can tell my setting of the servlet path is working (in my testXXX I println

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-29 Thread Eddie Bush
Erik Hatcher wrote: I'm still not having any luck with this issue (now at the 20021029 build). I've been toying with the request.setURL call in a Cactus beginXXX method, but that has no effect at all on this even though I can tell my setting of the servlet path is working (in my testXXX I

Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
I decided to try out a Struts nightly build (from a previous 1.1beta2 version) and I ran our Cactus test suite to see if all validated ok... but I'm getting all Struts tests failing with this error: String index out of range: -1 java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
Oh, sorry for omitting this nightly build 20021028 is the one I tried and got the errors below Erik Hatcher wrote: I decided to try out a Struts nightly build (from a previous 1.1beta2 version) and I ran our Cactus test suite to see if all validated ok... but I'm getting all Struts

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
More information after digging a bit. The change to RequestUtils (in version 1.61) has this log: Revision : 1.61 Date : 2002/10/15 17:37:25 Author : 'ekbush' State : 'Exp' Lines : +33 -11 Description : Change RequestUtils.selectApplication so that it looks for an exact match rather than using

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Eddie Bush
Can you verify your assumption with the logging output? It should say what the value of matchPath is. This would be a debug-level logging statment indicated by a line stating: Selecting module for path matchPath You may have to turn up the volume on your logging output to see it. I'd be

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
Eddie Bush wrote: Can you verify your assumption with the logging output? It should say what the value of matchPath is. This would be a debug-level logging statment indicated by a line stating: Selecting module for path matchPath You may have to turn up the volume on your logging output to

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:42:44 -0600 From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Nightly build issue Eddie Bush wrote: Can you verify your

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
[mailto:jakarta-struts;ehatchersolutions.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 19:43 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Nightly build issue Eddie Bush wrote: Can you verify your assumption with the logging output? It should say what the value of matchPath is. This would be a debug-level logging

Re: Nightly build issue

2002-10-28 Thread Erik Hatcher
Eddie Bush wrote: Can you verify your assumption with the logging output? It should say what the value of matchPath is. This would be a debug-level logging statment indicated by a line stating: Selecting module for path matchPath After getting the logging opened up, my results are matchPath