On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:27:34 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote:
> This looks pretty good, Ted. Just a couple of things:
>
> * If we're going to introduce the idea of Struts sub-projects right
> up front, then I would prefer to consider these as purely
> organisational, at least initially. That is, I
This looks pretty good, Ted. Just a couple of things:
* If we're going to introduce the idea of Struts sub-projects right up
front, then I would prefer to consider these as purely organisational, at
least initially. That is, I'm open to breaking up the code base / docs /
etc. into multiple sub-pro
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:01:35 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
> Actually, now that I read the generated HTML, I can see how this
> isn't actually a conflict -- the roles.xml blurb isn't actually
> saying that committers get to cast binding votes... I'm not coming
> up with better verbiage, but one clari
At 7:11 AM -0500 3/18/04, Ted Husted wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:20:54 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote:
I'll be putting together a list, shortly, of what needs to happen
next for us to fully "graduate". Stay tuned...
One thing the resolution mentions is that we are to draw up a set of bylaws.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:20:54 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote:
> I'll be putting together a list, shortly, of what needs to happen
> next for us to fully "graduate". Stay tuned...
One thing the resolution mentions is that we are to draw up a set of bylaws.
Heretofore, we've been operating under t
4 7:21 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts goes TLP with unanimous vote...
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Arron Bates wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > Just got the summary email from the Apache board meeting,
> and the Struts
> > propo
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Arron Bates wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Just got the summary email from the Apache board meeting, and the Struts
> proposal went through with flying colours.
>
> Congrats guys, really. So much never-ending quality work.
>
>
> I guess that with everyone else out driking Irish alcohol I
