Re: [OT] Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

2003-08-14 Thread Micael
Hi, Peter, Yah, there are some that don't like free knowledge or listening. So there was no way to not offend some people. I appreciate that. Why I don't know, and I don't need to know. But, I have a watch. LOL. Micael At 12:50 AM 8/13/2003 +0100, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: Micael wrote: Sig

Re: [OT] Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

2003-08-14 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
Micael wrote: Sigh! I cannot stand bad grammar, so once again I must remind my nerd +++ friends that "et al" strictly applies to people, and that an ~~~ ^ ^ ActionForward, while dear to my heart, is just not a person. LOL! I * && ew%&U(

RE: [OT] Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

2003-08-14 Thread PILGRIM, Peter, FM
> -Original Message- > From: Micael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, Peter, > > Yah, there are some that don't like free knowledge or > listening. So there > was no way to not offend some people. I appreciate that. > Why I don't > know, and I don't need to know. But, I have a wat

Re: [OT] Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Speed
And to add another pedantic log to the fire... :) Quoted from dictionary.com because it's easier than looking it up in a real text: --- et al adv 1: used as an abbreviation of `et alii' (masc. plural) or `et aliae' (fem. plural) or `et alia' (neut. plural) when referring to a nu