11/20/2002 3:09:36 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As for DynaActionForm's I still don't get their benefit. Do
>you use them? Or right ActionForm subclasses? Its even less
>code to "write" to do a form bean for me, because my IDE
>generates all the getter/setters, and being ab
discussion about this ?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:45 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Benefits of Dynaforms
11/20/2002 3:09:36 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As for DynaActio
---
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:45 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Benefits of Dynaforms
11/20/2002 3:09:36 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for DynaActionForm's I still don't get their benefit. D
; -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:12 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Benefits of Dynaforms
>
>
> Let me just emphasize the downsides that I mentioned already... using
> DynaForms would mea
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:45 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Benefits of Dynaforms
11/20/2002 3:09:36 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for DynaActionForm's I still don'
compile time safety.
> -Original Message-
> From: Afshartous, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 25 November 2002 10:27
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Benefits of Dynaforms
>
>
>
> Sounds like there are many benefits to using D
ok, this one sentence in ted's post caught my eye:
> I rarely write custom Actions any more.
whoah. how is this possible? most of our web pages represent some sort of
database operation: displaying, creating, updating, or deleting. i can see
how you can minimize the amount of code that would
Can anyone point me to the apis for dynaforms (beans)
fs
-Original Message-
From: Andre Beskrowni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:48 AM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: Custom Actions? (was RE: Benefits of Dynaforms)
ok, this one sentence in
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Custom Actions? (was RE: Benefits of Dynaforms)
>
>
> Can anyone point me to the apis for dynaforms (beans)
>
> fs
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Be
The idea behind a Struts Action is that it suppose to give you a
place to call your business logic components. Rather than call
various business processes through a subclass, I continue the
decorator pattern by declaring the process to call as part of the
ActionMapping.
I then use a standard
At 04:40 am 23-11-2002, you wrote:
The idea behind a Struts Action is that it suppose to give you a
place to call your business logic components. Rather than call
various business processes through a subclass, I continue the
decorator pattern by declaring the process to call as part of the
ActionM
The Actions are generic, but the ActionMappings are not =:0)
The ActionMapping passes command tokens to the standard Action so
that it knows which business process to invoke.
The business facade returns a result object with can carry
messages, data, and/or dispatch advice.
The messages are S
Ted,
So, with respect to the "routing instructions", you create a common
abstraction ("success", "failure", etc) describing the exit path of the
business process. Gotcha.
Thanks.
--
John
At 06:50 pm 27-11-2002, you wrote:
The Actions are generic, but the ActionMappings are not =:0)
The Action
Yes, but only if something unusual happens. In the normal course,
the struts-config routings fall through.
The core idea is that the abstractions belong to *my* application
interface. The struts-config is implementing these abstractions on
behalf of the greater application. Just as the languag
14 matches
Mail list logo
