RE: Latest and greatest?

2003-06-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
Ted wrote: > If there were absolutely no CVS changes that we wanted to include in the > release, then, yes, we could just rename it. In this case, there were > some minor changes that we would want to include, so the final release > would be "rolled" again from CVS. But, I do not believe anyon

Re: Latest and greatest?

2003-06-25 Thread Ted Husted
If there were absolutely no CVS changes that we wanted to include in the release, then, yes, we could just rename it. In this case, there were some minor changes that we would want to include, so the final release would be "rolled" again from CVS. But, I do not believe anyone is anticipating a

Re: Latest and greatest?

2003-06-25 Thread David Graham
--- Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I want to use what will become Struts 1.1, should I stay with the > release > candidate, or keep using the latest nightly build? In other words, if > it's > decided that RC3 is "it", will you just rename it and leave everything > the > same, or do

Re: Latest and Greatest 1.0 User's Guide

2001-01-21 Thread Steven D. Wilkinson
Ted Husted wrote: > > Since the chapters tend to start with generic headings, like > "Overview", I think it would read better if we set the chapter title > out at the top of the body, where the reader's attention is focused. > I like that. Then its easier to know where you are relative to the q

Re: Latest and Greatest 1.0 User's Guide

2001-01-21 Thread Ted Husted
On 1/21/2001 at 5:16 PM Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > It's the title of the HTML document -- isn't that good enough? If not, that is a pretty straightforward change. Since the chapters tend to start with generic headings, like "Overview", I think it would read better if we set the chapter title o

Re: Latest and Greatest 1.0 User's Guide

2001-01-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Ted Husted wrote: > Very, very kewl. > > Short Term Plan > > I'm about through the Users Guide, and will refresh my CVS and post > some very minor fixes. > > I'll also update the struts.xls to reflect a 2001 copyright (forward > into the present!) > > Meanwhile, > > Any thoughts on a better appr

Re: Latest and Greatest 1.0 User's Guide

2001-01-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Craig and lists, > > Is there are requirement NOT to use Frames? When viewing stuff that has a > nice TOC, it is easier to relate to the 'Quick Links' if they gave you a > sense of context. For example, I can't easily go from 'Controller > Components' to the Digeste

Re: Latest and Greatest 1.0 User's Guide

2001-01-20 Thread Ted Husted
Very, very kewl. Short Term Plan I'm about through the Users Guide, and will refresh my CVS and post some very minor fixes. I'll also update the struts.xls to reflect a 2001 copyright (forward into the present!) Meanwhile, Any thoughts on a better approach to formatting the example code.