Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

+1 for me "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in 1.1, and improve the > existing documentation, with a goal to release a beta 2 of Strust 1.1 in > the near future (ideally by July 8 or so). Part of my motivation for the > timing is that Sun is shut

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

I started a "Core Technologies" page that we could insert before the Introduction as Chapter zero. These gives a brief description of each of our enabling technologies and links elsewhere for more detail. If we wanted to add more detail later, it would be easy to expand on this page. http://

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > I think the basic Struts download needs at least an initial walkthrough on > all of the technologies it provides. Much a I'd love to be lazy and rely > on the incredible amount of effort others have put into this :-), we can't > just have nothing. I could do an en

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

On 27 Jun 2002, Arron Bates wrote: > Date: 27 Jun 2002 14:33:11 +1000 > From: Arron Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 >

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

> > Meanwhile, I've set up a "diff" section in the release notes with > > pointers to every thing with 1.1 features or deprecations, that could > > then be used to help create the 1.1 doc section. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/release-notes.html#diff > > > > AFAIK, the JavaDoc

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

> > If the tag implementation (not including release()) modifies the values of > > properties, then yes, we're in big trouble. This is the case I've come > > across before. > > > > I thought we had caught all of those, but want to make very sure. > > For example, if the second use of a tag sets

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

See intermixed. On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:39:04 -0700 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:44:48 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:44 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > >

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

For the docs, do you think it might be useful to add a new 1.1 section and march through the new features there, rather than patch the 1.0 docs? A 1.1 section might be easier to create, since we won't have to worry about segues, and will do double-duty as an upgraders guide. Of course, we could s

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:55:19 -0700 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Plan

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:45 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > >

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > >Are the other committers interested in working towards such a goal? > +1, I'll try to finish up the UML for classes. and put in place holders for the added package descriptions. Plus pitch in else where. -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:49:49 -0700 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Pl

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

+1 on Beta 2 soon (although my company isn't shutting down next week :). +1 also on reviewing the tags. I fixed one or two of these a while ago - they showed up after I started using Resin 2.x - but there are likely more that I didn't stumble across. A systematic review would be good. Related to

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

+1 and more than happy to help with bugs and docs. -james [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/ --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in > 1.1, and improve the > existing documentation, with a goal to release a > be