Re: cvs commit: veto - short term plan

2003-11-19 Thread Ted Husted
Since a better alternative has not been forthcoming, I plan on posting the Struts Resources Pages, as they were before the vetoed product change, at another location, and then removing them from the Struts site altogether. The pages will be hosted at the Struts SourceForge site, where any intereste

RE: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-14 Thread Deadman, Hal
y way. -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan To: Struts Developers List Sent: 11/13/2003 10:56 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: veto Quoting Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -1 > > The community can make up its own mind on issues regarding an > individual's b

RE: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-14 Thread Mike Jasnowski
(I know I would.) Agreed. Thanks, Mike Jasnowski -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:41 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: veto Please, let's *not* start rehashing the General list discussion here. Like

Re: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-14 Thread Ted Husted
Please, let's *not* start rehashing the General list discussion here. Like Vegas, what goes on in General should stay in General. :) http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40jakarta.apache.org/ The topic here is that a Committer has requested a product change that another Committer has vetoed. It'

RE: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-14 Thread PILGRIM, Peter, FM
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > To address Ted's (legitimate) concern, I would prefer that > we adopt a more > > stringent (but one that can be administered based on > reasonably objective > > criteria) policy on Struts

Re: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-13 Thread Ted Husted
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: To address Ted's (legitimate) concern, I would prefer that we adopt a more stringent (but one that can be administered based on reasonably objective criteria) policy on Struts website content -- no advertisements of *any* commercial resources related to Struts. Google do

Re: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -1 > > The community can make up its own mind on issues regarding an > individual's behavior. > Like any commit to change software, other committers can -1 them for valid reasons. > I formally ask that any product changes made for the sole purpose of

Re: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-13 Thread Vic Cekvenich
I promise to *try* not to comment on this issue on any public lists, it really is up to the members. I support Struts, Apache and Open Source!! .V Ted Husted wrote: -1 The community can make up its own mind on issues regarding an individual's behavior. I formally ask that any product changes

Re: cvs commit: veto

2003-11-13 Thread Ted Husted
-1 The community can make up its own mind on issues regarding an individual's behavior. I formally ask that any product changes made for the sole purpose of censoring an individual be reversed, with the exception of consultants and powered, which pages can be removed completely as they are obs