I wonder if the issue here is really about fonts.
http://maven.apache.org/
...it looks great on my work pc (IE on Win2k), but looks like crap on my
laptop (RH8 with Mozilla)
This is exactly my point. If you're using IE it's ok, but not other
browsers. Mozilla has an irritating habit of renderi
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:26, James Holmes wrote:
> Well, we're all entitled to our own opinion. However,
> mine differs from yours as I think the other format is
> much clearer and easier to read.
I wonder if the issue here is really about fonts.
http://maven.apache.org/
...it looks great o
The sans-serif font is definitely better in the new format but they made the
left navigation an eye chart.
David
From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re
If you search the archives, Craig has already commented on this. We
haven't moved to this tool, IIRC, for the same reason some people have
not adopted Struts 1.1..because it is still considered beta.
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:04, Joe Germuska wrote:
> Has anyone else looked at developing a Ma
Well, we're all entitled to our own opinion. However,
mine differs from yours as I think the other format is
much clearer and easier to read.
-James
--- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I know this was brought up some time in the past
> when
> >I was looking at updating the Struts webs
I know this was brought up some time in the past when
I was looking at updating the Struts website to the
"pretty" format generated by Maven. Perhaps there
will be time and place for it once 1.1 is out.
Do you mean the tiny, confusing, and unreadable format?
-James
David
--- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL
I know this was brought up some time in the past when
I was looking at updating the Struts website to the
"pretty" format generated by Maven. Perhaps there
will be time and place for it once 1.1 is out.
-James
--- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone else looked at developing a M
