RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-29 Thread mread
age- From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 April 2002 00:46 To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility What you are saying is exactly why I am proposing. All of my current Action Classes are fairly sim

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-29 Thread mread
at http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/workflow.html? Matt. -Original Message- From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 April 2002 17:00 To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility I like what you are saying here Matt

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-26 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
oops. I asked my wife how that was spelled. It's her fault :-). The thread of discussion has continued under the name of "RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility". It has come to my attention that the workflow proposal might adress the issue. But, I don't see s

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-26 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
ECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility I've used the following successfully to pass parameters to the actions and obviously each action will have available any POST data passed in a submit. Un

FW: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-26 Thread Matt Read
at http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/workflow.html? Matt. -Original Message- From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 April 2002 17:00 To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility I like what you are saying here Matt

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-26 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
Matt. -Original Message- From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 April 2002 00:46 To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility What you are saying is exactly why I am proposing. All of m

Re: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-26 Thread Matt Read
age- From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 April 2002 00:46 To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility What you are saying is exactly why I am proposing. All of my current Action Classes are fairly sim

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-26 Thread Steven D. Monday
ttp://www.phase.ws -Original Message- From: Hal Deadman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:58 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility It sounds like what your trying to do falls outside of the Strut

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
Deadman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:58 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility It sounds like what your trying to do falls outside of the Struts mandate to aid in the VC of an MVC application. Action class

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Joe Germuska
>http://www.phase.ws > > >-Original Message- >From: Tim Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:41 PM >To: Struts Developers List >Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility > > >Does the interface of a Process di

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Hal Deadman
ent action classes, make those modular. > -Original Message- > From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:36 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility > > > You

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Tim Moore
C 20036 Phone 202-463-4860 ext. 258 / Fax 202-463-4863 > -Original Message- > From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:36 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility >

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
b and Multimedia P (406) 862-2245 F (406) 862-0354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phase.ws -Original Message- From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:36 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility Yo

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility Does the interface of a Process differ at all from Action? This sounds like something that could possibly be implemented now by making a ChainingAction or some such that simply called the perform m

RE: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Tim Moore
20036 Phone 202-463-4860 ext. 258 / Fax 202-463-4863 > -Original Message- > From: Phase Web and Multimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:32 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility > >

Struts Improvement Proposal: Logic Extensibility

2002-04-25 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
Okay here is the idea I proposed earlier ("Struts (MVC) Shortcomings?") in more solid thought. My hope in this is to provide an non-hard-coding mechanism to take advantage of reusable logic without having to forward around to a bunch of Action classes (which doesn't work anyways). Here is my pro