On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:32:20 -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Quoting Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wouldn't the context object used by struts-chain contain everything
> you might need in Velocity-land? It would be a shame to invent a
> second "context" object if we're going that directio
Quoting Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 7:00 AM -0500 3/26/04, Ted Husted wrote:
> >Another way to go would be to provide a "API object" in the request
> >that the tags, or any other presentation technology, could use to
> >access framework resources.
> >
> >In this way, no one else would
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:56:11 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
> I love this. I actually hadn't seen it before. We had talked
> briefly a few days ago about a "StrutsContext" as the argument to
> Action.execute() and Renderer.render() -- but it looks to me like
> this class is everything I would expect
At 7:00 AM -0500 3/26/04, Ted Husted wrote:
Another way to go would be to provide a "API object" in the request
that the tags, or any other presentation technology, could use to
access framework resources.
In this way, no one else would need to the various special
locations, only where to find
