up with a solid, scaleable
architecture. Any suggestions? Opinions? Pros and cons for either solution?
Can I ask why you wonder if maintaining Velocity templates will be
harder?
Also, you can use Velocity with Struts if you wish...
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Chris Kmiec wrote:
I am in charge of architecting a little web system which will use some of
the jakarta components. I am torn between using Struts and Turbine. I am
wondering if maintaining Velocity templates will be more difficult than just
using straight
framework) work happily with
EJBs? Thats the basic idea of the J2EE architecture, isn't it? A
servlet-based front end talking to a business logic / data tier...
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web? See http
be involved?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
framework, interested in evolving Velocity through comparison
with other technologies [yes, I will steal every good idea I see :-) ],
and understanding more about approaches to web development frameworks.
So be nice :)
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing
6 matches
Mail list logo