Actually, I think I'm completely off on that include element. For some
reason I tought a forward element would specify a forwarding ActionForward
and include element would specify an included ActionForward. But I think
the include element does not exist.
You can always make this a servlet
a
list of entries with every odd entry in blue and even in red. I cannot
think of a better way to do this than with a conditional in the view.
ranko
-Original Message-
From: Martin Naskovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:12 AM
To: Ranko Bijelonic
Cc: Struts
it.
ranko
-Original Message-
From: Martin Naskovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:42 AM
To: Ranko Bijelonic
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re[4]: Ranko like question: What is the sense of some of these
tags libs?
Then, if they're so alike as you claim, use
I'm not sure how ActionServlet processes ActionForwards, but if it uses the
forward() method of the RequestDispatcher then the response cannot be
commited already. In addition, forward() will commit so you cannot try to
commit again. This means that if you have more than one jsp:include
mapped
When the ActionServlet forwards to your view that is usually the only
forward that happens and everything is fine.
When you include another Struts Action in your view with jsp:include,
another forward happens.
If you are not doing anything in the Action but returning an ActionForward
to the jsp
Ok I was looking for a way to tell the ActionServlet to include, rahter than
forward to the view.
It seems you do it with include element instead of forward element in
your action mapping configuration.
So your action path=selectedproviderinfo.do... should have a include
instead of a forward to
yeah, i don't use tags :). But, it looks like one does not have to worry
about matching curly braces when using the tag code :). Seriously though,
most of the scriplets in my JSPs are minimal, and are just as easy (to me as
a Java programer though) as the tags. HTML coders would probably
Hi,
First of all, I want to thank everyone for their responses. I was concerned
that the questions I posed could be misinterpreted as an attack on Struts
and usefulness of the framework, and that I would get some heated responses.
However, everyone only tried to help me better understand the
Hi. I've been using Struts for a long time, and I've been very happy with
the framework. However, a recent discussion on Sun's Java forums has left
me wondering if Struts is necessary. It seems that the servlet container
itself provides an MVC framework very similar to that of Struts. All
.
There are always some set of requirements that occur more frequently and
they need to put together as reusable piece of code and that's why STRUTS is
here.
regards
Navjot Singh
|-Original Message-
|From: Ranko Bijelonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:42 PM
|To: [EMAIL
that
what you build is timeless (and works on their
servers...)
Struts solves common problems across every typical
application. The servlet container does not solve
these typical problems. Struts is really a pattern...
sandeep
--- Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I've been using
...
|
|sandeep
|--- Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Hi. I've been using Struts for a long time, and
| I've been very happy with
| the framework. However, a recent discussion on
| Sun's Java forums has left
| me wondering if Struts is necessary. It seems that
| the servlet container
.
sandeep
--- Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's a lot of stuff it gives you out of the
box.
1. solid code
so does the container i guess.
2. validation framework
This is one of those changes that could be added by
way of utility classes.
Have that Filter that autopopulates
persnickity, or is there a
serious question/concern ?
From: Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts MVC framework similar to that of a servlet container?
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:38
a gaping hole? Are you being persnickity, or is there
a
serious question/concern ?
From: Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts MVC framework similar to that of a servlet
. And this is a
standard.
Struts addresses a shortcoming and continues to do so.
sandeep
--- Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok. assume i go through the process below. now i
have RANKo framework :)
(which I did actually). Then I learn about Struts
and say, hey this serves
the same function as my
advantageous
over using Struts? Or, are you looking for areas that Struts just
doesn't
handle, leaving a gaping hole? Are you being persnickity, or is
there
a
serious question/concern ?
From: Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED
It is my understanding that the servlet spec, jsp spec, and jsf spec are
regarded
as the framework of frameworks (a kind of interpretation of mine) Struts
action mapping is designed in Struts way. If the struts-config.xml is
merged
into the web.xml, a lot of other frameworks would not happy :-)
friendly control system.
From: Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jing Zhou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts MVC framework similar to that of a servlet container?
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18
: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:14 PM
To: Ranko Bijelonic; Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts MVC framework similar to that of a servlet
container?
- Original Message -
From: Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jing
Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'll wait for Struts 3.0. It should be J2EE compliant by then :) hehe.
Serbia.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Naskovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:29 PM
To: Ranko Bijelonic
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts MVC framework similar
Message -
From: Ranko Bijelonic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jing
Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:31 PM
Subject: RE: Struts MVC framework similar to that of a servlet container?
I am getting more clear about your thinking. But saying both
- such as the overlap between JSTL and what the struts
view tags do (which incidentally is no coincidence - the one strongly
influenced the development of the other!).
-Original Message-
From: Ranko Bijelonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 10:54
To: Struts Users Mailing List
presumptuous - in most
cases struts provided the feature first and other implementations and ways
of doing it came later
-Original Message-
From: Ranko Bijelonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 03:10
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts MVC
provides is an
excuse to join this mailing list. Ive not seen any other framework or
technology with such a helpful community around it!
-Original Message-
From: Ranko Bijelonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:38
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts MVC
25 matches
Mail list logo
