Re: A suggestion for Product-quality Code

2002-01-08 Thread Keith Bacon
Thanks Frank for that list - I wanted to do one but spent very little time on struts. I'll agree with anyone that complains about the error handling documentation. In general I do solve errors quite quickly, but I worry about the level of skill needed to use struts. I've briefly seen bits of

A suggestion for Product-quality Code

2002-01-07 Thread Frank Lawlor
Now that Struts has passed its 1.0 birthday I would like to suggest something that I think would help the many users it is attracting. When I have lead development groups I have explained one of the differences between a prototype and a product as programming for more that the narrow path.

Re: A suggestion for Product-quality Code

2002-01-07 Thread Pete Carapetyan
One possible route to skirting the problems you correctly outline, and many others, is to use a framework which implements Struts, such as, but not limited to, the Expresso framework, where much of the plumbing is done for you. Taking this one step further, using a code generator, such as, but

Re: A suggestion for Product-quality Code

2002-01-07 Thread David Morris
Frank, Your logging suggestion makes sense to me, I have hit every one of these myself at least once. I hadn't thought of them as bugs, but I it may be helpful to add them to the Apache Software Foundation Bug Database so that they can acted on or rejected. I will try to do the same. The URL