Re: action.xml

2001-04-18 Thread Ratnadeep Bhattacharjee
It has been replaced by struts-config.xml -Deep. > > Hi, > I am new to struts and was going thru the > documentation for struts 1.0-b1. I found that > action.xml file is no more necessary in version 1.0. > Could anyone please clarify with this. The > docuementation says th

Re: action.xml

2001-04-18 Thread Marcile Moulene
it's now called struts-config.xml sampath kanakaraju wrote: > Hi, > I am new to struts and was going thru the > documentation for struts 1.0-b1. I found that > action.xml file is no more necessary in version 1.0. > Could anyone please clarify with this. The > docuementat

action.xml

2001-04-18 Thread sampath kanakaraju
Hi, I am new to struts and was going thru the documentation for struts 1.0-b1. I found that action.xml file is no more necessary in version 1.0. Could anyone please clarify with this. The docuementation says that this file has been deprecated. I am confused. Thanx for the information. sampath

Re: action.xml

2001-02-01 Thread Ted Husted
On 2/1/2001 at 9:03 AM John Hunt wrote: > Is there a to remove the bean from the session scope after the purpose is solved. Yes. You can remove the same as any other bean. If a new one is needed later, Struts will create it again. Here's a snip from the example application: // Remove t

Re: action.xml

2001-02-01 Thread John Hunt
Is there a to remove the bean from the session scope after the purpose is solved. Say I have 50 pages and out of that 5 pages share one form bean. I would put that bean in the session scope. But I dont want that to be alive for that entire session except for that 5 pages right Another quest

Re: action.xml

2001-01-31 Thread John Hunt
> > Hi > > In the deprecated action.xml was there a way to > > specify scope for the form beans. If yes how. > > Is the scope attribute in the new > struts-config.xml a > > scope for the form bean??? > > Thanks > > Hunt > > > > In both version

Re: action.xml

2001-01-31 Thread JamesW
> If a formBean is spread acroos multiple but > consecutive ( again consecutive ) pages, should I put > the bean in session or will the request scope do > because they are consecutive pages. I believe, session, since each visit to each page in sequence is a separate request. Regards, James W.

action.xml

2001-01-31 Thread John Hunt
Hi In the deprecated action.xml was there a way to specify scope for the form beans. If yes how. Is the scope attribute in the new struts-config.xml a scope for the form bean??? Thanks Hunt __ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail

Re: action.xml

2001-01-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
John Hunt wrote: > Hi > In the deprecated action.xml was there a way to > specify scope for the form beans. If yes how. > Is the scope attribute in the new struts-config.xml a > scope for the form bean??? > Thanks > Hunt > In both versions, the "scope" at

Re: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > going through the struts example I wonder why there is an action.xml and a > struts-config.xml > because there are many equal entries (action-mappings). > As others have indicated, "action.xml" is there as a compatibility a

Re: AW: Antwort: AW: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread Ted Husted
#conf ig Oliver -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2001 11:26 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Antwort: AW: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml Hi, so in fact I only have to concentrate on on of these

Re: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread Matthias Bauer
Hi there, I would say that in the example application the action.xml file is not used. Just have a look at the web.xml file. There struts-config.xml is provided as the config parameter to the ActionServlet: > > > action > org.apache.struts.action.A

Re: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread Rob Leland
It is confusing. If you are starting a new application then use struts-config.xml and delete action.xml. The action.xml was originally used with struts 0.5, after that struts-config.xml was created which replaces action.xml. It is only left in the example application since struts 1.0 will still

AW: Antwort: AW: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread Oliver . Lauer
action.xml Hi, so in fact I only have to concentrate on on of these configuration files? Would be nice to read that in the documentation or have I missed something? Regards Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] am 25.01.2001 11:30:41 Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED

Antwort: AW: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread michael . brohl
) Thema: AW: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

AW: why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread Oliver . Lauer
Hi, those two, I guess, are more or less redundant while action.xml is depreciated and has a different syntax and dtd. I used struts-config.xml within the example and this one worked. Oliver -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am

why struts-config.xml AND action.xml

2001-01-25 Thread michael . brohl
Hello, going through the struts example I wonder why there is an action.xml and a struts-config.xml because there are many equal entries (action-mappings). Thank you for the explanation in advance. Regards Michael

Re: Action.xml

2001-01-22 Thread martin . cooper
nahan wrote: >Katherine Barry wrote: > > > Craig, > > The second approach is the one I am trying, but the problem is that the XML > > syntax is in the DOCTYPE declaration. There isn't one in the action.xml. I > > can add a declaration with the external file, and t

Re: Action.xml

2001-01-22 Thread Rob Leland
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. In the 'struts example' there is still an Action.xml in the distribution for Jan 22 2001. If it isn't used then at least in the 'struts example' it should be removed. -Rob "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > Rob Le

Re: Action.xml

2001-01-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Rob Leland wrote: > I thought action.xml, was depreciated, and no longer used > however it is still in the struts download as of January 17. > > Shouldn't this be removed ? It is still supported (even though deprecated) in 1.0, along with the deprecated tag library, so the exam

Action.xml

2001-01-22 Thread Rob Leland
I thought action.xml, was depreciated, and no longer used however it is still in the struts download as of January 17. Shouldn't this be removed ?

RE: action.xml and struts-config.xml

2001-01-04 Thread Robinson, Brian
>From the Struts trail map at http://developer.bluestone.com/scripts/SaISAPI.dll/StrutsTrailMap.class/stru ts-trailmap/Trail4.htm, there is a Note which answers your question: Note: It should be noted that in earlier releases of Struts struts-config.xml was referred to as action.xml. These fi

Re: action.xml and struts-config.xml

2001-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
struts-config.xml is the successor to action.xml. action.xml is deprecated, and won't be supported past the 1.0 release. To use the new format, the ActionServlet validate property should be set to true. struts-config.xml is basically a superset of action.xml, so where you see that ment

action.xml and struts-config.xml

2001-01-04 Thread Alain Hubert
I'm using struts last build with Tomcat. A newbie question. I'm looking at the different struts examples coming with the distribution and I'm trying to figure out why action.xml is sometimes used and why it is sometimes not. For instance, in the struts-example application, action

Re: Pre-compiled JSPs in action.xml path=URI possible ??

2001-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Ron Bolin wrote: > > > > Is struts designed to work with pre-compiled JSPs? Is it possible in struts > 1.0 to define and > use classes in the forward path argument rather than JSP as shown below. I am > interested > in speeding up the initial screens in our project. > > I have been toying with th

Re: Pre-compiled JSPs in action.xml path=URI possible ??

2001-01-03 Thread Ron Bolin
> Is struts designed to work with pre-compiled JSPs? Is it possible in struts 1.0 to define and use classes in the forward path argument rather than JSP as shown below. I am interested in speeding up the initial screens in our project. I have been toying with this, bus so far have not been able

Re: Difference between action.xml and struts-config.xml

2000-11-24 Thread Pierre Métras
Hi Koen, Use the struts-config.xml if you want to create a new application. It's the new version 1.0 file format used by struts. For compatibility with version 0.5, Struts can read the old action.xml file. The version you choose to use is defined in web.xml: a

RE: Difference between action.xml and struts-config.xml

2000-11-24 Thread Kevin Gibbs
As I undertand it... action.xml was used up to the 0.5 milestone release. The current development release is able to use either, but from v1.0+ action.xml will no longer be supported. > -Original Message- > From: De Smet Koen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November

Difference between action.xml and struts-config.xml

2000-11-24 Thread De Smet Koen
Hello, We're looking at struts for a few days now and it looks good, but I was wondering the following: What's the difference between action.xml and struts-config.xml for the action mapping? I see that in both files you nearly define the same things. Can somebody explain us the

Re: Action.xml

2000-11-23 Thread Wong Kok Wai
Using XInclude is the solution but I don't know whether Xerces support XInclude or not. Katherine Barry wrote: > What I've got is: > > Action.xml: > > > ]> > >

RE: Action.xml

2000-11-23 Thread Katherine Barry
What I've got is: Action.xml: ]> &deployment; -- I've had to add the DOCTYPE declaration since the action.xml doesn't normally have one. This causes a parsing error on startup.

Re: Action.xml

2000-11-22 Thread Martin Cooper
Craig & Katherine, Here's a message from ant-user that describes how to do this (for Ant, at least, although it should work for action.xml as well). -- Martin Cooper Tumbleweed Communications - Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: Action.xml

2000-11-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Katherine Barry wrote: > Craig, > The second approach is the one I am trying, but the problem is that the XML > syntax is in the DOCTYPE declaration. There isn't one in the action.xml. I > can add a declaration with the external file, and then reference it later, > but i

RE: Action.xml

2000-11-22 Thread Katherine Barry
Craig, The second approach is the one I am trying, but the problem is that the XML syntax is in the DOCTYPE declaration. There isn't one in the action.xml. I can add a declaration with the external file, and then reference it later, but it still doesn't work. Katherine -Origin

Re: Action.xml

2000-11-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Katherine Barry wrote: > I want to break this file up into several files. Anyone know how to do this? > > Katherine Offhand, I can think of at least two approaches: * Store the pieces of action.xml in separate text files, and then have (as part of your build script) a command that

Action.xml

2000-11-22 Thread Katherine Barry
I want to break this file up into several files. Anyone know how to do this? Katherine

Re: Difference between action.xml & struts_config.xml

2000-11-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
"Ansaldo, Gaston" wrote: > Craig: > thanks for your reply; actually, I undertood it the way your are > describing the behavior but what I can't understand is why every time I add > new paths in a Struts 0.5 app I have to update both files. Should be enought &g

RE: Difference between action.xml & struts_config.xml

2000-11-16 Thread Ansaldo, Gaston
Craig: thanks for your reply; actually, I undertood it the way your are describing the behavior but what I can't understand is why every time I add new paths in a Struts 0.5 app I have to update both files. Should be enought updating action.xml? What i'm doing is extending t

Re: Difference between action.xml & struts_config.xml

2000-11-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
"Ansaldo, Gaston" wrote: > Hi.! > Can anyone tell me what is the difference between this two files? When > should I use each of them and what for? > I think I answered this earlier (blasted email reader is duplicating messages on me), but just in case: "action.xm

Difference between action.xml & struts_config.xml

2000-11-15 Thread Ansaldo, Gaston
Hi.! Can anyone tell me what is the difference between this two files? When should I use each of them and what for? Thanks, Gastón

Re: action.xml and struts-config.xml

2000-11-08 Thread Larry Rogers
Marcel, It's true that they serve the same function and contain similar things. The file action.xml with its format belongs to the 0.5 release, and struts-config.xml is the name for 1.0. You only need one or the other, depending on the version of Struts you are using. About a month ago

Re: action.xml and struts-config.xml

2000-11-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Marcel Ruff wrote: > Hi, > > i am a bit confused, what is the diference between > action.xml and struts-config.xml, they seem to contain > similar things? > The "action.xml" file was the old way to configure Struts (for the 0.5 milestone). Going forward (versio

action.xml and struts-config.xml

2000-11-08 Thread Marcel Ruff
Hi, i am a bit confused, what is the diference between action.xml and struts-config.xml, they seem to contain similar things? thanks, Marcel -- Marcel Ruff