lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Struts app design for multiple client types
> >
> > I'm in the process of designing a single web app to support two different
> client
> > types: HTML and VoiceXM
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Kris Schneider wrote:
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:12:36 -0500
> From: Kris Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Struts app
Thanks for tip, I took a quick look. I have to say the first example
made my head spin.
http://home.attbi.com/~danjacobs/jplates.com/examples/test/ClassInfo1.jplate
It just doesn't look like the kind of approach that would appeal to the
no-scriptlet faithful (which is where I firmly plant mysel
Hi Kris,
Unless your application data starts off as XML in the first place, and
assuming you're a Java programmer, I recommend using JPlates
(http://www.jplates.com) for multi-target transformations. JPlates is a
fully object-oriented template language, and I've used it very
sucessfully both
| -Original Message-
| From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:58 PM
| To: Struts Users Mailing List
| Subject: RE: Struts app design for multiple client types
|
| Any take on having the filter perform the transform vs. JSTL (see
original
Stxx might be a model you could consider as a solution as well.
http://www.oroad.com/opencode/stxx/
-Original Message-
From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:40 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts app design for multiple client
eider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:40 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts app design for multiple client types
Was JSTL an option that you considered and then discarded? If so, I'd be
interested in hearing why.
How did you duplicate the fun
Message-
> | From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> | Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:13 PM
> | To: Struts Users Mailing List
> | Subject: Struts app design for multiple client types
> |
> | I'm in the process of designing a single web app to support t
here were no apparent performance issues and I am sure such a solution
> will
> be able to handle HTML, VoiceXML and WAP solutions.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:13 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing
Struts Users Mailing List
| Subject: Struts app design for multiple client types
|
| I'm in the process of designing a single web app to support two
different
| client
| types: HTML and VoiceXML. Yes, yes, I know, XSLT is just the ticket.
That
| was my
| initial take at least, but I'd lik
will
be able to handle HTML, VoiceXML and WAP solutions.
-Original Message-
From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:13 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Struts app design for multiple client types
I'm in the process of designing a singl
rsday, January 16, 2003 2:13 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Struts app design for multiple client types
I'm in the process of designing a single web app to support two different
client
types: HTML and VoiceXML. Yes, yes, I know, XSLT is just the ticket. That
was my
initial take at
I'm in the process of designing a single web app to support two different client
types: HTML and VoiceXML. Yes, yes, I know, XSLT is just the ticket. That was my
initial take at least, but I'd like to bounce some things off the Struts hive
before committing to it. To add some context, I'll be deplo
nfigure...
> >
> > so, no, i don't see any real reason for using frames for other things than
> > doing some static designer-portfolio-pages (but i think they are currently
> > overusing flash for this purpose...)
> >
> > ps: excuse me for this elaborat
this purpose...)
>
> ps: excuse me for this elaborate rage, but i have been burnt before in
> projects where i was forced to use frames
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Keith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL
t;Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: App Design
>
> Is there a good argument for using frames? It needs to be good, they
obviously
> are problematic to use.
> Beware the page linked to below is dated Dec. 199
ows it by now ;)
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:10 PM
> Subject: App Design
>
>
> > Hi all,
> > I am thinking of structuring an application as follows,
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:Re: App Design
Can "the action that doesn not really do anything" just forward to the
desired page in the usual way?
One approach would be to have the Javascript set the desired
Can "the action that doesn not really do anything" just forward to the
desired page in the usual way?
One approach would be to have the Javascript set the desired page as
field in the form before it is submitted. The Action could then retrieve
the page, and return the appropriate ActionForward.
everybody knows it by now ;)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:10 PM
Subject: App Design
> Hi all,
> I am thinking of structuring an application as follows, and
> would appreciate any
Subject: Re: App Design
From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
Use tiles instad and a "Struts" menu (from Husted site).
Vic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am thinking of structuring an application as follows, and
> would appreciate any advi
Hi all,
I am thinking of structuring an application as follows, and
would appreciate any advice and ideas of how to do this:
There will be two frames. First is a navigation frame where the user
presses a button to determine the JSP that is loaded into the second frame.
Each possible
22 matches
Mail list logo
