nd I believe would help give development teams a jumpstart
> for using Struts as part of their J2EE projects.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 4:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Client-side
Title: RE: Client-side validation (Old questions that die hard)
Ted,
Since it has been a month or so since you were "hip deep" in Ultradev, can you provide a quick list of how it needs to be configured to handle struts tags for round-tripping.
This and similar info for other IDE
7;s probably not the best syntax, but I think you get what I mean.
Thanks, Neal
> -Original Message-
> From: David Winterfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Client-side validation (Old quest
I actually had some built-in expressions for testing,
but then I pulled it out for simplicity. I had some
basic things like phone numbers and such hard coded in
and checking for a date (leap year, etc.), but I
thought it might be better to wait and think about it
a little more so someone could pl
David Winterfeldt wrote:
> I posted the code and a example war at. Ted, if you
> want to, you can add this to the list of struts
> sites/resources you have.
I've added this to my list at < http://husted.com/about/struts >, along
with Craig T's very kewl presentation.
If this keeps up, we're g
I added basic client side javascript validation that
matches the server side validation. Validation rules
are stored in an xml file.
I thought that if the form had a locale attribute that
would take care of i18n or there could be separate
files like the property resource files.
I was also thi
Maya Muchnik wrote:
> Thank you, David.
> I have tested struts-example with disabled JavaScript on Netscape. It is still
> working!!!
> Maya
>
The only JavaScript code in the Struts example is the attempt to set input focus
on the first field on each form. In this case, the lack of JavaScript i
nk you can in IE, means you can rely on Javascript if you know your
> users are all IE..
>
> see ya
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mmuchnik [mailto:mmuchnik]On Behalf Of Maya Muchnik
> Sent: 13 February 2001 22:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Old qu
ik
Sent: 13 February 2001 22:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Old questions that die hard
David,
Could you, please, email, how to disable JavaScript in Netscape and / or IE.
thanks,
Maya
"Verratti, David" wrote:
> Basic rule - don't count on client for anything other tha
> Sent: 13 February 2001 20:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Old questions that die hard
>
> > Of course, late-model Javascript also supports regex ...
>
> Perhaps you mean "newer versions of JavaScript"...
>
> (I'm a stick
to disable
Javascript.
see ya
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 February 2001 20:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Old questions that die hard
> Of course, late-model Javascript also supports regex ...
Perhaps you mean "newer vers
> Of course, late-model Javascript also supports regex ...
Perhaps you mean "newer versions of JavaScript"...
(I'm a stickler sometimes, a weissenheimer the remainder.)
Is there good cause to support ancient browsers?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get person
My initial thoughts were to look at what some of the advanced HTML
authoring tools, like FrontPage and Dreamweaver do with this. Craig
mentioned to me that the client-side validations should be coordinated
with any new work on server-side validations.
Obviously, some standard "domain type" valid
Ted Husted wrote:
> Jim Richards wrote:
> >The other thing I haven't found reference to yet is
> >client side validation (but I also haven't looked that hard either)
>
> It's on the 1.1 TODO list.
>
> And, of course, we're glad that you've checked in again!
I did notice that you had your name
Ted Husted wrote:
> Jim Richards wrote:
> >The other thing I haven't found reference to yet is
> >client side validation (but I also haven't looked that hard either)
>
> It's on the 1.1 TODO list.
>
> And, of course, we're glad that you've checked in again!
I did notice that you had your name
Jim Richards wrote:
>The other thing I haven't found reference to yet is
>client side validation (but I also haven't looked that hard either)
It's on the 1.1 TODO list.
And, of course, we're glad that you've checked in again!
I've been out of the Struts loop for a few weeks (or months, or years based on
Internet time) and I am impressed that almost everything is ready for a 1.0
release, which means Craig's comments below still stand, re: Multipage forms
and forms built dynamically. The other thing I haven't found refe
17 matches
Mail list logo
