Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, James Holmes wrote: > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:18:18 -0800 (PST) > From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re:

Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Robert Leland wrote: > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:10:54 -0500 > From: Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Graph of Struts Growth.l > > Back in Feburary of 200

RE: Graph of Struts Growth.l

essage- > From: Bartley, Chris P [PCS] [mailto:cbartl03@;sprintspectrum.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:42 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: Graph of Struts Growth.l > Importance: Low > > > > -Original Message- > > Fro

RE: Graph of Struts Growth.l

> -Original Message- > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:08 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l > > > I just can't imagine there being so danged many emails - and such

Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l

Need to loosen that tie just a bit Eddie. ;) - Original Message - From: "Eddie Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:15 PM Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l > LMAO - yo

Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l

LMAO - you were serious?! I thought you were cracking a joke about my comments! ... shoulda known better ... :-) James Mitchell wrote: LOLno...the Rand() is Randomize. (Completely Useless Data) Sorry, just thought I'd have a little fun while making a small point. James Mitchell S

RE: Graph of Struts Growth.l

#x27;m not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) > -Original Message- > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:08 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l > > > I j

Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l

I just can't imagine there being so danged many emails - and such a large percentage of them [OT]. ... do we blabber senslessly that much? I actually went back and examined Rob's again after I clicked send. His corroborates yours pretty much. I just can't believe there's that much traffic!

RE: Graph of Struts Growth.l

#x27;m not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) > -Original Message- > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:54 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l > > > T

Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l

That chart makes me feel like there should be some sort of accompanyment. You know - a sound-track! The numbers look a bit high though. Are you doing some multiplication in there? ... a factor of say 2-5? Very interesting guys. James Mitchell wrote: That's really cool. I have a chart of

RE: Graph of Struts Growth.l

e universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) > -Original Message- > From: James Holmes [mailto:jholmes612@;yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:18 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Gr

Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l

Very interesting! I would tend to agree with these numbers as the Struts Console download rate has significantly increased over time. I get over a hundred downloads a day now versus under 50 several months ago. I wonder if there are any numbers for how many Struts downloads there are? 1.0 vs 1.