RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-31 Thread Weber, Jeremy
alue.length() > 0)) { return true; } else { //errors.add(field.getKey(), Resources.getActionError(request, va, field)); errors.add(field.getKey(),StrutsValidatorUtil.getActionError(request,va,fiel d)); return false; }

Re: Validator requiredIf

2002-12-16 Thread Rob Leland
Michelle Wynn wrote: Has anyone had any success validating conditionally with requiredIf client-side? There does not seem to have been a javascript method created for this validation method. I looked in 1.1B and the most recent nightly build. Also haven't had success validating server side

RE: Validator requiredIf

2002-12-16 Thread James Turner
Requiredif doesn't implement client-side validation, to my mind it would be too hard to come up with a mechanism to generate Javascript for the fairly complex cases you can generate using it. If someone wants to take a crack at writing it, feel free. James > -Original Message- > From: Mi

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
I'm Still struggling with requiredif... there doesn't seem to be a working example of it included with 1.1b3. I've gone through the documentation and come up with this. I'm trying to say that address is required only if 1. prospect is null 2. prospectNameOrId is not null 3. action is not e

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread PILGRIM, Peter, FM
(0)207-375-4923 > -Original Message- > From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 January 2003 17:41 > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > > I'm Still struggling with requiredif... there do

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread James Turner
Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > > I'm Still struggling with requiredif... there doesn't seem to > be a working example of it included with 1.1b3. I've gone > through the documentation and come up with this. I'

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Sri Sankaran
Man, that looks convoluted. Sri > -Original Message- > From: PILGRIM, Peter, FM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:03 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > In the Struts User G

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread James Turner
> From: Sri Sankaran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:30 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > Man, that looks convoluted. > > Sri Well, short of implementing a full boolean expression langua

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Sri Sankaran
-Original Message- > From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:39 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > > From: Sri Sankaran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Se

Re: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Matthew Meyer
:55 -0500 "Sri Sankaran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Man, that looks convoluted. Sri -Original Message- From: PILGRIM, Peter, FM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:03 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] required

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
James wrote: > A quick look at that configuration looks correct. Let me know if it > doesn't work for you. No, it doesn't. It's as if that rule isn't even there-- if there is no prospect, and there is a prospect name, even if the address is blank, it passes validation and goes to the next step.

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread James Turner
> From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:44 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > James wrote: > > A quick look at that configuration looks correct. Let me know if it

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
James wrote: > Dumb question: Are you sure you're running validations at all? Yes. I have some simple validations like: and datePatternStrict MM/dd/ on

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Karr, David
03 11:39 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > From: Sri Sankaran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:30 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > Man, t

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread James Turner
> From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:05 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ?? > > > Gee, I haven't been paying much attention to this issue, but > that looks like there could be

RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??

2003-01-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:06:19 -0500 > From: James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE:

Re: [validator] requiredif based on a value

2003-04-04 Thread David Graham
So, you're saying that effectiveDate is requiredif state == 940? Try adding [0] to the end of the field* vars. David Is it possible to require a field based on the value of another field? I tried the following, but no dice:

RE: [validator] requiredif based on a value

2003-04-04 Thread Raible, Matt
> So, you're saying that effectiveDate is requiredif state == 940? > Yep. > Try adding [0] to the end of the field* vars. > That worked - thanks! I've hacked together some client-side javascript for this since there's not one in the validator natively - I'll try to work a method up for equal