anybody else have any comments? there seems to be quite a heated debate around this
issue
-Original Message-
From: ALAMI Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:24 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Webwork vs Struts
Chck this site, it's interesting
Ok guys this is getting out of hand, please is anyone out there that can help me with
some info, I appreciate the responses so far, but now theres
Maverick aswell, any comments.
Basically, what we need is a web-development framework. We want to develop for a Java
Environment.
We will deploy to
-
From: Butt, Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:31 PM
Subject: RE: Webwork vs Struts vs Maverick please help
| Ok guys this is getting out of hand, please is anyone out there that can
help me with some info, I appreciate
Chck this site, it's interesting
--Webwork is more flexible for building frameworks to access the model level, that can
be integrated in an UI (Swing, ...)
--Struts is more useful for handling web actions
http://www.rollerweblogger.org/page/roller/20030113
-Message d'origine-
De :
I'm sure that subject has come up a lot in the past, perhaps consult the mailing list
archives.
After starting our project with struts, and fumbling over configuration stuff, I had a
cursory look at webwork and decided that i just dont get it and stuck with struts.
Good luck,
Mark
***
Chris Wilson wrote:
hello,
i was just reading on the jboss mailing list and someone was talking about
using struts with jboss (http://www.jboss.org -- an open source j2ee
implementation). one of the authors of jboss said he was working on a
similar framework, "but which is *A LOT*
6 matches
Mail list logo