RE: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread John Espey
I believe classes are never garbage collected, only objects. What sort of issue are you having where this question arose? -Original Message- From: Adolfo Miguelez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: are static classes GC'd? A

RE: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread Adolfo Miguelez
-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: are static classes GC'd? Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:46:13 -0600 I believe classes are never garbage collected, only objects. What sort of issue are you having where this question arose

RE: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread John Espey
] Subject: RE: are static classes GC'd? Sorry, of course I meant the unique instance of the static class. We have a templates caches filled under demand, and implemented as a singleton hashtable. We suspect that GC could be cleaning the cache. Under heavy stress we are getting some errors

RE: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread Adolfo Miguelez
List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: are static classes GC'd? Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:07:18 -0600 As long as the objects aren't wrapped in weak references, I don't see how they would get garbage collected (they still have an active reference in the hashtable) -Original Message- From

Re: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread Malik Recoing
Friday, January 31, 2003 4:20 PM , Adolfo Miguelez [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I agree. But, could the hashtable be collected before since it has not references in the method? Or is TemplatesCache.getInstance().get(key); considered as a reference? If you use the Sigleton D.P. as it must be,

RE: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread John Espey
in this case. What type of errors are you getting? -Original Message- From: Adolfo Miguelez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: are static classes GC'd? I agree. But, could the hashtable be collected before since it has

RE: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread Bueno Carlos M
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: are static classes GC'd? I agree. But, could the hashtable be collected before since it has not references in the method? Or is TemplatesCache.getInstance().get(key); considered as a reference? Thanks From: John Espey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts

Re: are static classes GC'd?

2003-01-31 Thread Adolfo Miguelez
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: are static classes GC'd? Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:32:08 +0100 Friday, January 31, 2003 4:20 PM , Adolfo Miguelez [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I agree. But, could the hashtable be collected before since it has not references in the method? Or is TemplatesCache.getInstance