Hi Dean,
The struts workflow extension will just work as well with dynaValidatorForms or any
other type of bean you use as form bean.The only point where it differs from standard
struts is the ActionMapping.It uses a ActionMapping class of its own.But that also can
be taken care of.
Just start
Also you need not use the session scope for the form.What ever data you want to share
across pages, you can use workflow container to hold that data...
Have a look at the Demo application and Test Application(available with the standard
download ).The test application in fact demonstrates quite
Have a look at the extension and let me know if you still have any questions.
HTH.
Regards,
Shirish.
-Original Message-
From: Hookom, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:58 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts Workflow
No matter what, I
Mike, search this list's archives. This was discussed a few days ago..
Regards,
Geeta
Mike Duffy wrote:
> Does anyone have any great ideas on creating customizable workflows in Struts?
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
> http:/
You can visit this web:
http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/
Alvaro
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Duffy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: Struts Workflow
Does anyone have any great ideas on creati
My suggestion is to build your own. This is fairly simple stuff that must
be wedded to your own way of coding your site or application that will fit
your business requirements. Make it general for use in other
places. Create, for example, you own do/undo/redo to work with but
independent of
, February 26, 2004 12:42 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts Workflow
My suggestion is to build your own. This is fairly simple stuff that must
be wedded to your own way of coding your site or application that will fit
your business requirements. Make it general for use in other
Here's part of a thread on struts-dev related to your question:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg20449.html
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have used the workflow extension for struts
> (http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/introduction.html) and found it very useful.
>
> My question
---
From: "Marcus Peixoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for
furtherdevelopment and maintenance?
Matthias,
How much of your
>in nature
> >How much would your company say this effort is worth?
> >Saludos,
> >Martin Gainty
> >001-617-852-7822
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Marcus Peixoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List&quo
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for
furtherdevelopment and maintenance?
Matthias,
How much of your spare time have you been spending on it ?
I have some spare time but I don't know if I hav
7-852-7822
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Peixoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Struts Workflow Extension] Any volunteers for
furtherdevelopment and maintenance?
> M
Matthias,
How much of your spare time have you been spending on it ?
I have some spare time but I don't know if I have enough experience in
Java to handle it.
[]'s
Marcus
Em Seg, 2003-12-15 Ãs 08:41, Matthias Bauer escreveu:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am looking for someone who would like to take
First of all my apologies for the late response to your mails you also
sent to me personally, but I was on vacation and did not check my
E-Mails for quite a while.
I feel that the workflow definition, beside of violation detection,
should allow for dynamic navigation.
The framework should provid
Tommy Holm - TELMORE wrote:
Hi
I have a problem which best is described as follows. I have a primary
workflow(WF1) that at a certain time branches off to a secondary
workflow. It is left in a state so that progess can be continued at a
later stage. I my new workflow (WF2) I describe that a seconda
Thanks Mathias!
That makes everything clear.
I think you should do that documentation update, it's so crucial to workflow security
and at least I didn't get that point without asking :))
Dankeschön nochmals!
Axel
On 2003-10-21 at 09:21:08 +0200, Matthias Bauer wrote:
> Axel,
>
> your suggestion
Axel,
your suggestion unforunately does not work as you would expect.
The action definition you are suggesting defines nextState=2 and
newState=2. This means, that after the action has been executed, the wf1
is in state 2. Thus, any action that does not change the state of wf1
can be executed
Well.
If you take a look at the struts-config.xml you'll see that there are two
actions defined:
wf1St2Loop
and
wf1St2LoopEnd
The second is just a forward changing workflow values.
I just can't figure out a reason, why there are two instead of one simpler
action.
for your convenience, original
can you elaborate a little?
Too less info :-((
-Original Message-
From: Axel Gross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop?
Hello!
I had a close look to the test appli
Shirish,
I really like your mails, because you always seem to be answering your
questions for yourself. :-)
It does not make any difference whether the validation checks are done
in the form or the action: The workflows' states have already been
updated before. Thus, you need to point your inp
Hi Mattias,
We have run into another problem with the workflow extension.
We are not using the auto validation mechanism of struts(We set validate=false in
action mapping.)
Following is the scenario where we run into problem.The relevant workflow action
mapping parameters are indicated in brack
AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension] design question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Matthias,
I will have a close look at the demo and test applications.I need some generic way to add the workflow extention to my existing working screens so that the user will
-
From: Matthias Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension] design question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thanks Matthias,
>
>I will have a close look at the demo and test applications.I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Matthias,
I will have a close look at the demo and test applications.I need some generic way to add the workflow extention to my existing working screens so that the user will be kept informed of the workflow violations and given a choice to leave the workflow or s
:26 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension] design question
Shirish,
why do you want to change the workflow extension for doing this? Maybe
you want to have a look at the demo application. If I am getting you
right, I suppose I am doing exactly what you want to
Shirish,
why do you want to change the workflow extension for doing this? Maybe
you want to have a look at the demo application. If I am getting you
right, I suppose I am doing exactly what you want to do: Just let the
action that handles the workflow violation put the application specific
war
official release.
Thanks for the help.The requestProcessor configuration is working now.
Regards,
Shirish.
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension and
configuration is working now.
Regards,
Shirish.
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [struts workflow extension and tiles]Problem with
configuring the request processor
Shirish,
what Struts version are you using? I certainly tested the
TilesWorkflowRequestProcessor together with the Tile plugin and it
worked fine in my setup. Has the Tiles initialization code changed lately?
--- Matthias
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am evaluating the struts workflow ex
I know of about 30 people having me contacted directly for questions
since May 15, when version 1.0.0 of the extension came out. All of them
seemed to be very much willing to use the extension in their projects.
Before Version 1.0.0 there were about 400 downloads per month for about
half a year
Anyone has implementing an workflow engine or workflow application with
struts?
Sorry to answer so late, but I did not have the chance to check the
mailing list for some time...
Depending how you define "workflow engine" you can have a look at
http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/ .
I know two wo
Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: struts workflow
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:32:07 -0600
Diego,
At my company we are using struts and weblogic intergrater. It is going
pretty good with the development.
Shay
-Original Message-
From: Diego Campodonico [mailto:[E
Diego,
At my company we are using struts and weblogic intergrater. It is going pretty good
with the development.
Shay
-Original Message-
From: Diego Campodonico [mailto:dcampodonico@;netversatile.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: struts workflo
Yes, specifying multiple prevStates is allowed.
--- Matthias
Amit Harsola wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thanks. It worked.
> I want to know one more thing. Can there be 2
> prevStates for a single action.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Matthias Bauer
Hi Matthias,
Thanks. It worked.
I want to know one more thing. Can there be 2
prevStates for a single action.
Thanks,
Amit
--- Matthias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With your configuration, your are in the following
> state, after having executed
> the action "/mai
Chris,
I have not used any Cactus Test Cases with the Workflow Extension, but the
exception indicates, that the mapping that is passed into the Action's perform
method is not an instance of com.livinglogic.cms.struts.workflow.ApplicationMapping.
How to resolve this issue depends on what struts
Hi...
I also did some testings with this package in Struts 1.1, and got it
working. There was some modifications in that must be done in the example
application so it can work:
In web.xml, the init-parameter "mapping" is not used anymore. Instead, you
must add "className=com.livinglogic.struts.wo
37 matches
Mail list logo