Re: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Prashanth.S wrote: But this doesnt solve my problem as it says me to use url rewriting.. Thanks Prashanth If you use the Struts tags for generating hyperlinks, you get support for either for free ... and you as a developer don't have to worry about doing something special. Craig

Re: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Prashanth.S
But this doesnt solve my problem as it says me to use url rewriting.. Thanks Prashanth Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd have though cookie use was upto the user rather than your client. http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/struts-html.html#link On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 1

Re: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Mark Lowe
I'd have though cookie use was upto the user rather than your client. http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/struts-html.html#link On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 12:16 PM, Prashanth.S wrote: Hi navjot, My clients doesnt want me to use cookiesSo that my application should run even for

RE: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Prashanth.S
Hi navjot, My clients doesnt want me to use cookiesSo that my application should run even for users who have disabled cookies...The problem with url-rewriting is that jsessionid is maintained across applications so that if any one get url of the application they can go through the applicatio

RE: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Navjot Singh
here is the clue. cookies are again of two types. + persistent - will remain there even if you close browser and opens next day. + non-persistent/session - the moment you close browser window they are gone. These also work only under child browser windows. So, i assume you are looking for sessio

RE: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Prashanth.S
Hi navjot, Thanks for the reply...But the problem with url rewriting is that jsessionid is maintained across browsers so that users can access the application if they get the url..[even on other system the application work if u get the url]..so is there any other option??? Thanks Prashanth Nav

Re: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Woger
Navjot Singh wrote: theoretcially, there are 3 ways. 1. URL Rewriting 2. Client side Cookies 3. Server side Session (again use cookies but just for an ID) if you are adamant about not using cookies at any level. URL rewriting is the only option left. any other? Server side Session of course

Re: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Mark Lowe
Hi Prashanth IMHO if you thinking about these as separate things then you're thinking wrong. Sessions use url encoding and cookies to maintain state. But when site building you shouldn't need to drill down this far. Folks often think it clever to manipulated cookies, cos it looks real clever..

RE: urlrewriting Vs Cookies

2003-10-08 Thread Navjot Singh
theoretcially, there are 3 ways. 1. URL Rewriting 2. Client side Cookies 3. Server side Session (again use cookies but just for an ID) if you are adamant about not using cookies at any level. URL rewriting is the only option left. any other? navjot singh >-Original Message- >From: Prash