How is Poolman better than the database connection manager included with struts?
Speed?
Reliablity?
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:29:07 -0500
"hemant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but Iam sure it will be back. It is too good to be shelved. The current
> version (v2.1) works fine for me.
>
_
Subject: Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
Poolman is very popular. Don't worry.
Vic
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
> being developed?
>
Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:56 AM
Subject: RE: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
> I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
> being developed?
>
> Niall
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
being developed?
Niall
> -Original Message-
> From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 April 2002 23:12
> To: struts
> Subject: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
>
>
> I currently use poolman in
4 matches
Mail list logo