Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

2002-04-02 Thread $B%"%s%H%K!<(B $B%9%F%$%9(B
How is Poolman better than the database connection manager included with struts? Speed? Reliablity? On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:29:07 -0500 "hemant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but Iam sure it will be back. It is too good to be shelved. The current > version (v2.1) works fine for me. > _

Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

2002-04-02 Thread @Basebeans.com
Subject: Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === Poolman is very popular. Don't worry. Vic Niall Pemberton wrote: > I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer > being developed? >

Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

2002-04-02 Thread hemant
Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:56 AM Subject: RE: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman > I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer > being developed? > > Niall > > > -Original Message- > > From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

2002-04-02 Thread Niall Pemberton
I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer being developed? Niall > -Original Message- > From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 April 2002 23:12 > To: struts > Subject: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman > > > I currently use poolman in