Re: Security FIlter Framework

eworks for allowing role based access into the web app.(may be including the security filter framework.)Any suggestions on how this can be done and design decisons Role based access meaning different users could get access only to different set of pages and anot all-trying tos eparate authentic

Security FIlter Framework

Hi, We have a web app implemneted in struts and deployed in Weblogic 7.0.We are planning to implement/consider filter frameworks for allowing role based access into the web app.(may be including the security filter framework.)Any suggestions on how this can be done and design decisons

Re: [OT] Security Filter -> Active Authentication (Better)

okay... I didn't want to commit it to the Struts sf.net cvs until I had it working as a functioning example web app. So, I have my rudimentary conglomeration of files at: http://www.phase.ws/security/security.zip Look for a working example over the next few days on the sourceforge struts project

Re: [OT] Security Filter -> Active Authentication (Better)

I'm an idiot... I already have CVS access to the sf.net project. Hehe... I'll committ it there. But, I warn you... what I am putting in the CVS is not a full functioning web example... I'll add that later. But, for now it's just code that needs to be organized better. But, it does give you an idea

Re: [OT] Security Filter -> Active Authentication (Better)

I'm putting it together. If a committer on the Struts sf.net project wants to give me permissions to create a cvs project for this... I'd be happy to. Also, it would be nice to receive back contributions on how to make this better. I'll send a zip to anyone who wants it. Brandon Goodin --

Re: [OT] Security Filter -> Active Authentication (Better)

ot; idea introduced > in Java Developers Journal. I like it much better than Security Filter. > It allows me to use the TRUE container's standard authentication. Also, > I get ALL the features that SecurityFilter provides and ALL the features > of container based security. If you wo

Re: [OT] Security Filter -> Active Authentication (Better)

I wrote an implementation of the "Active Authentication" idea introduced in Java Developers Journal. I like it much better than Security Filter. It allows me to use the TRUE container's standard authentication. Also, I get ALL the features that SecurityFilter provides and ALL

Re: Security Filter and ActionForm

CTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:55 AM Subject: SV: Security Filter and ActionForm We use this consept. The loginform is unsecured (not filtered). When trying to access a secured page with no session (this is checked by the filter), - the request is forwarded to the loginpage. Afte

SV: Security Filter and ActionForm

the errror, - i.e. logon failed... Geir -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: Curtney Jacobs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 10. januar 2003 16:19 Til: Struts Users Mailing List Emne: Security Filter and ActionForm Greetings!! I have a login ActionForm (LogInForm) and a associated login Action

Re: Security Filter and ActionForm

ruts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 7:19 AM Subject: Security Filter and ActionForm > Greetings!! > > I have a login ActionForm (LogInForm) and a associated login Action class > (LogInAction). When the form is submitted, the req

Security Filter and ActionForm

Greetings!! I have a login ActionForm (LogInForm) and a associated login Action class (LogInAction). When the form is submitted, the request is intercepted by a Security Filter. The Security filter authenticates and perform necessary authorization checks on the user via a ldap server. If the

Re: Security Filter

Max, Does SecurityFilter support tiles as well? I've already downloaded it from SourceFourge :) Could you please send me some configuration information? For instance, web.xml changes, how to use JDBCRealm with it, and so on. I would really appreciate it. Regards, Elder -- To unsubscribe, e-