go to sourceforge.net and search for it
On Thursday 04 Apr 2002 4:22 am, you wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, 7:42:27 PM, someone wrote:
> > How is Poolman better than the database connection manager
> > included with struts? Speed? Reliablity?
>
> I'm curious about this also. Also, where ca
On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, 7:42:27 PM, someone wrote:
> How is Poolman better than the database connection manager
> included with struts? Speed? Reliablity?
I'm curious about this also. Also, where can I get Poolman and
documentation if the site is down> I'm looking for fairly robust
con
How is Poolman better than the database connection manager included with struts?
Speed?
Reliablity?
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:29:07 -0500
"hemant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but Iam sure it will be back. It is too good to be shelved. The current
> version (v2.1) works fine for me.
>
_
Subject: Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
Poolman is very popular. Don't worry.
Vic
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
> being developed?
>
Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:56 AM
Subject: RE: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
> I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
> being developed?
>
> Niall
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
being developed?
Niall
> -Original Message-
> From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 April 2002 23:12
> To: struts
> Subject: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
>
I currently use poolman in my webapp. I was wondering if anyone got a chance to play
with the classes in commons-dbcp.jar.
How different are these from poolman?. I still dont think that Struts classes provide
features such as resultset cache, periodic update of the cache with new data, query
c
7 matches
Mail list logo
