I've been using Struts (1.0) for a few months now, and
I'm not seeing a big advantage to using it other than
that it does Model 2 (which is very very wise) and
hides some of the heavy lifting.
ActionForms get you server side form validation and
HTTP parameters->bean mapping.
The taglibs get y
mpbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Value of Struts?
>
>
> I've been using Struts (1.0) for a few months now, and
> I'm not seeing a big advantage to using it other than
> that it do
(608) 935-4526
>-Original Message-
>From: Gene Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:07 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Value of Struts?
>
>
>I've been using Struts (1.0) for a few months now, and
>I'm not seeing
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Value of Struts?
I've been using Struts (1.0) for a few months now, and
I'm not seeing a big advantage to using it other than
that it does Model 2 (which is very very wise) and
hides some of the heavy lifting.
ActionForms get you server side form validati
ent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Value of Struts?
>
>
> I've been using Struts ...
> something something something
> I'm just having a hard time figuring out why
> Struts is so popular.
>
> thanks - gene
"Democracy is the worst kind of government there is, except for
everything else out there".
I think W. Churchill.
Think of Struts as kindergarten: "We put our coasts here, we put our
books here, etc."
It also has best productivity if you do it right. 2 ti 3 CRUD M/D muli
row modules per day is
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:07 PM
Subject: Value of Struts?
> I've been using Struts (1.0) for a few months now, and
> I'm not seeing a big advantage to using it other than
> that it does Model 2 (which is very very wise) and
> hi
this project. If you really want to know the "value of struts",
just guess an average salary and multiply by number of hours. If you guess
appropriately, the number should stagger you.
Also consider you're using a very old version of Struts. I encourage you to
check out 1.1; t
s EASY too?
Thanks Craig, Ted, Arron, Cedric, David, David, Martin and the rest of
the Contributors for providing such an awesome product.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Value
You can simply just get to work
on what makes your application unique.
jaaron
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Value of Struts?
>
>
> I've bee
You also mention that you are on 1.0
1.1 has many more features that further reduce coding time. Play around
with DynaValidatorForm for instance...
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 16:07, Gene Campbell wrote:
> I've been using Struts (1.0) for a few months now, and
> I'm not seeing a big advantage to using
ROLER. Its a perfect de-coupling!
And non the less...its an OPEN SOURCE...
Regards
Puneet
- Original Message -
From: "J Aaron Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 6:12 AM
Subject: RE: Value of Struts?
>
I read everyone's responses to Gene Campbell's question and I think
there should be a place on the Struts website (maybe a wiki or
something?) where all of these good folks who responded to him could put
up their "Why I love Struts" comments. I know I have to answer this
question often to clie
You can also say, "IBM integrated Struts support into WSAD". IBM is
supportive of OSS in general though.
David
From: Robert McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OT] web site
gh.
David
From: Robert McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OT] web site idea (was Value of Struts)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:17:28 -0600
I read everyone's responses to Gene Campbell'
Users Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [OT] web site idea (was Value of Struts)
That is true. After all they both donate and use a lot of Apache/Jakarta
stuff. I believe they use Jasper and I know they rebrand Apache web server.
Robert
David Graham wrote:
> You can also say, "IBM integrate
-Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT] web site idea (was Value of Struts)
>
>
> You can also say, "IBM integrated Struts support into WSAD". I
(was Value of Struts)
That is true. After all they both donate and use a lot of Apache/Jakarta
stuff. I believe they use Jasper and I know they rebrand Apache web server.
Robert
David Graham wrote:
> You can also say, "IBM integrated Struts support into WSAD". IBM is
> supp
-1.
My philosophy is under promise over deliver.
If you put this on a site, than someone's mileage may vary.
Then when you get on a client's site it will be "how come we didn't have
xyz here?"
.V
Robert McIntosh wrote:
I read everyone's responses to Gene Campbell's question and I think
there
ocity, and on and on...
Many big names use a lot of OSS. (IBM, Oracle, Sun)
tibor
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Robert McIntosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 18:04
An: Struts Users Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [OT] web site idea (was Value of Struts)
20 matches
Mail list logo
