On 2014-02-27 17:15, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:42 +0100, Jef Driesen wrote:
Hi,
For the "Ability to Configure Dive Computers" idea, one of the
prerequisites is access to a supported dive computer. I think you can
easily drop this requirement. The most likely target dive compu
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:42 +0100, Jef Driesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the "Ability to Configure Dive Computers" idea, one of the
> prerequisites is access to a supported dive computer. I think you can
> easily drop this requirement. The most likely target dive computer for
> this feature is the H
Hi,
For the "Ability to Configure Dive Computers" idea, one of the
prerequisites is access to a supported dive computer. I think you can
easily drop this requirement. The most likely target dive computer for
this feature is the Heinrichs-Weikamp OSTC. It's open source, the
available settings
On 27 February 2014 11:58, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> also i currently only use that mingw 4.4.0 compiler with Qt 4.8.x;
> have not tested yet mingw 4.8.x, Qt5 and marble for Qt5.
>
or rather only: "have not tested marble for Qt5 yet".
lubomir
--
___
On 27 February 2014 04:43, Alberto Corona wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to CC the mailing list:
>
> I see, I wasn't aware of that. In that case most of what I had done should
> be thrown out the window! I'll make sure to stick to msys, in the meantime
> it really seems that cross-compiling is the only al
Sorry, forgot to CC the mailing list:
I see, I wasn't aware of that. In that case most of what I had done should
be thrown out the window! I'll make sure to stick to msys, in the meantime
it really seems that cross-compiling is the only alternative that doesn't
require one to leap through flaming
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 18:00 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em qua 26 fev 2014, às 17:20:19, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> > > As for the issue of the GCC version being old, feel free to get a newer
> > > version of MinGW. The Qt 4.8.6 pre-release packages are now built with a
> > > new MinGW too:
> > >
Em qua 26 fev 2014, às 17:20:19, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> > As for the issue of the GCC version being old, feel free to get a newer
> > version of MinGW. The Qt 4.8.6 pre-release packages are now built with a
> > new MinGW too:
> >
> > http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/4.8/2014-02-17_484
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:47 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em qua 26 fev 2014, às 16:38:15, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:54 -0600, Alberto Corona wrote:
> > > Alright so, I've gone through either building most of the dependencies
> > > natively, or using the binaries and I'd
Em qua 26 fev 2014, às 16:38:15, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:54 -0600, Alberto Corona wrote:
> > Alright so, I've gone through either building most of the dependencies
> > natively, or using the binaries and I'd like to make a few changes to
> > the instructions. Most notably
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:54 -0600, Alberto Corona wrote:
> Alright so, I've gone through either building most of the dependencies
> natively, or using the binaries and I'd like to make a few changes to
> the instructions. Most notably using Cygwin instead of Msysgit as
> Cygwin has an installer tha
Alright so, I've gone through either building most of the dependencies
natively, or using the binaries and I'd like to make a few changes to the
instructions. Most notably using Cygwin instead of Msysgit as Cygwin has an
installer that offers some of the dependencies that are needed. This will
let
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 21:10 +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 26 February 2014 20:51, Alberto Corona wrote:
> >
> > Hey Lubomir, I've tried building subsurface natively on Windows but ran into
> > quite a few problems when following the INSTALL instructions. What method do
> > you got about doi
On 26 February 2014 20:51, Alberto Corona wrote:
>
> Hey Lubomir, I've tried building subsurface natively on Windows but ran into
> quite a few problems when following the INSTALL instructions. What method do
> you got about doing so to build successfully? The major issue I ran into was
> due to t
e: 25 February 2014 18:08
> Subject: Re: GSoC 2014 Ideas
> To: "Lubomir I. Ivanov"
>
>
> I'll very likely be sending my proposal for this idea. I'll be able to
> set up the build environment for subsurface on my Windows machine
> later today, I have mos
sounds good,
please, CC the mailing list when responding so that everyone can
follow the discussion.
lubomir
--
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alberto Corona
Date: 25 February 2014 18:08
Subject: Re: GSoC 2014 Ideas
To: "Lubomir I. Ivanov"
I'll very likel
On 25 February 2014 04:39, Alberto Corona wrote:
> Hi, I plan on entering the GSoC program, and hopefully work on one of the
> listed ideas. Integrating minizip sounds like something right up my ally as
> most of my personal projects are primarily written in C and C++. I also of
> course do my ver
Em seg 24 fev 2014, às 20:39:02, Alberto Corona escreveu:
> Hi, I plan on entering the GSoC program, and hopefully work on one of the
> listed ideas. Integrating minizip sounds like something right up my ally as
> most of my personal projects are primarily written in C and C++. I also of
> course d
We suggest that all students start by submitting a couple of small patches
before we pick them... This will help us get to know you better...
/D
---
From my phone
Alberto Corona wrote:
>___
>subsurface mailing list
>subsurface@hohndel.org
>http://li
Hi, I plan on entering the GSoC program, and hopefully work on one of the
listed ideas. Integrating minizip sounds like something right up my ally as
most of my personal projects are primarily written in C and C++. I also of
course do my version control with git. Is there someway I could get in
con
20 matches
Mail list logo
