#define LIBGIT2_VER_MAJOR 0
#define LIBGIT2_VER_MINOR 20
save-git.c: In function 'create_new_commit':
save-git.c:580:3: error: too many arguments to function 'git_branch_create'
if (git_branch_create(ref, repo, branch, commit, 0, author, Create
branch))
^
can anybody recheck this for me?
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
#define LIBGIT2_VER_MAJOR 0
#define LIBGIT2_VER_MINOR 20
Debian has a 0.19.0-2 package in 'experimental', which means
unavailable for 'unstable', 'testing', 'stable'. So most people will
need to build it locally.
Cheers,
--
Cristian
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
cristian.ionescu-idbo...@axis.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
#define LIBGIT2_VER_MAJOR 0
#define LIBGIT2_VER_MINOR 20
Debian has a 0.19.0-2 package in 'experimental', which means
unavailable for
On Mar 7, 2014 5:42 AM, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote:
can anybody recheck this for me? from what Linus wrote, this should work
for libgit2 0.20, but I had to extend his macro to check the libgitversion
to be = 20.
You are probably right that it should be = 20.
I only tested 0.19
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 08:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mar 7, 2014 5:42 AM, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote:
can anybody recheck this for me? from what Linus wrote, this should
work for libgit2 0.20, but I had to extend his macro to check the
libgitversion to be = 20.
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 08:30 -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 08:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mar 7, 2014 5:42 AM, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote:
can anybody recheck this for me? from what Linus wrote, this should
work for libgit2 0.20, but I had to
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
cristian.ionescu-idbo...@axis.commailto:cristian.ionescu-idbo...@axis.com
wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
#define LIBGIT2_VER_MAJOR 0
#define LIBGIT2_VER_MINOR 20
On 07 Mar 2014, at 01:20, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
just a few comments.
- turn the current subsurface directory into a git repository
(~/subsurface/ on Linux, ~/Library/Application Support/Subsurface on
MacOS, and CSIDL_APPDATA/Subsurface/ on Windows)
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de wrote:
I hope you mean something like ~/.subsurface or even ~/.subsurfacerc . At
least for me ~/subsurface is already a git repository and is my subsurface
working directory (containing the source).
I actually did mean
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 13:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de wrote:
I hope you mean something like ~/.subsurface or even ~/.subsurfacerc . At
least for me ~/subsurface is already a git repository and is my subsurface
Em sex 07 mar 2014, às 13:28:20, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
I hope you mean something like ~/.subsurface or even ~/.subsurfacerc .
At least for me ~/subsurface is already a git repository and is my
subsurface working directory (containing the source).
I actually did mean ~/subsurface.
Linus,
I can probably do the Qt UI in about 2h ( learning what need to be done on
the UI, of course, never played with libgit. )
So, if this enters on subsurface master, I'll do the UI this weekend.
Tomaz
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
So
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 13:28 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So Dirk knows about this effort, and it's been rattling around in my
head for a long while, but it took some time for me to digest how to
actually do it.
When I saw your G+ post I was trying to remember when we first started
talking
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
compiling save-git.c
save-git.c: In function ‘create_new_commit’:
save-git.c:569:3: error: too many arguments to function ‘git_branch_create’
save-git.c:572:2: error: too many arguments to function
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
I'll have to figure out the versioning, it is not obvious where that happens.
Damn library authors that don't get the whole you need to get versioning
right
This patch on top of the earlier one seems to make
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 14:29 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
compiling save-git.c
save-git.c: In function ‘create_new_commit’:
save-git.c:569:3: error: too many arguments to function ‘git_branch_create’
save-git.c:572:2:
If you don't mind I'd add this to your previous commit - this way I have
one fewer possible doesn't compile point when doing a git bisect in
the future.
You also forgot a commit message and SOB...
/D
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 14:40 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:29 PM,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
how do you intend the actual UI to work?
Ideally this would be a no user interaction UI in most cases. I don't
want divers to have to wonder what we might mean by branch and other
strange terminology...
So my expectation is
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
If you don't mind I'd add this to your previous commit - this way I have
one fewer possible doesn't compile point when doing a git bisect in
the future.
You also forgot a commit message and SOB...
I actually intended for
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
how do you intend the actual UI to work?
Ideally this would be a no user interaction UI in most cases. I don't
want divers to have to wonder what we might mean by
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
The problem with that is that it exposes terminology to Joe and Jane
Diver that I'd prefer to hide from them.
Actually, with the git save-file, my *preference* would be that the
default filename configuration would basically
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 16:20 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
The problem with that is that it exposes terminology to Joe and Jane
Diver that I'd prefer to hide from them.
Actually, with the git save-file, my *preference*
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
So what about 'trip membership' - is the location in the tree relevant
for that?
Yes, it would nest like the XML thing nests (ie one level only), but
would be the only actual nesting.
And from an implementation standpoint,
23 matches
Mail list logo
