Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 05:04:29PM +0200, Dietrich Meyer wrote: > > Right now I'm building Windows (that gets a decent amount of testing it > > seems), Mac (not as much), Ubuntu (very little), openSUSE/Fedora (any?). > > I am using subsurfacedaily on Opensuse Tumbleweed, installed from the OBS, >

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:46:55AM -0400, John Van Ostrand wrote: > I'm a fedora user but I don't see binaries at that link. I can build and do > some simple testing of the latest code this weekend. I'll also take a look > at the APK. For Fedora and openSUSE getting the test binaries is yet diffe

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Aaron Scheiner wrote: > Regarding Subsurface-mobile on Android : > > If bluetooth is inactive when the application is launched, the bluetooth > devices list is only populated with one entry : "FTDI". > If you then enable Bluetooth, the app fails to refresh

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 04:33:56PM +0200, Aaron Scheiner wrote: > Ubuntu 17.04 x64 : (4.6.4-839) > I get this (which I also get from my own build - missing plugin. I > confirmed my build isn't present when running "your" binary from the PPA) : > > qml: MapWidget.qml: cannot find a plugin named: go

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 08:46:06PM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > >> also, what Qt version do you have? > > > > Seems to be 5.5.1 on the OS. (Everything works when I build myself > > against Qt 5.9.1, but this error was when testing our packages from > > launchpad.) > > > > they don't seem to b

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote: > > > > > > I can test on Fedora 26 and Windows 7 and 10. > > > I usually build from source in F26, but have not managed to build the > > > Google Earth plugin myself. > > > > I thought I tested that on Fedora. Need to go back to that, I g

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Rick Walsh
On 22 September 2017 at 21:44, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:13:05PM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote: > > On 22 Sep. 2017 20:24, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote: > > > > If you are regularly / occasionally testing any of these builds, could > you > > respond here, please? > > > > I can test on F

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Willem Ferguson
I am diving for another week. When I am back I will give top priority to running and testing Ubuntu. Kind regards, willem On 22 Sep 2017 12:24, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote: > As we start thinking about the next release (never mind that we still > haven't managed to get Subsurface-mobile 2.0 out the do

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 22 September 2017 at 18:26, Miika Turkia wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov > wrote: >> On 22 September 2017 at 17:29, Miika Turkia wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: So this is missing the QML modules for location and positioning.

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Miika Turkia
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > On 22 September 2017 at 17:29, Miika Turkia wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> So this is missing the QML modules for location and positioning. Obviously >>> this shouldn't crash. Equally obviously, I'd

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 22 September 2017 at 17:29, Miika Turkia wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> So this is missing the QML modules for location and positioning. Obviously >> this shouldn't crash. Equally obviously, I'd prefer if we figured out how to >> install those automatically

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dietrich Meyer
> Right now I'm building Windows (that gets a decent amount of testing it > seems), Mac (not as much), Ubuntu (very little), openSUSE/Fedora (any?). I am using subsurfacedaily on Opensuse Tumbleweed, installed from the OBS, updated to 4.6.4.839-1.1 today. > If you are regularly / occasionally te

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 22 September 2017 at 16:43, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > So this is missing the QML modules for location and positioning. Obviously > this shouldn't crash. there might be a way to check if the Map QML object is initialized property. i can try adding checks before invoking QML methods, but i'm not su

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread John Van Ostrand
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Aaron Scheiner wrote: > Regarding Subsurface-mobile on Android : > > If bluetooth is inactive when the application is launched, the bluetooth > devices list is only populated with one entry : "FTDI". > If you then enable Bluetooth, the app fails to refresh the li

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Aaron Scheiner
Regarding Subsurface-mobile on Android : If bluetooth is inactive when the application is launched, the bluetooth devices list is only populated with one entry : "FTDI". If you then enable Bluetooth, the app fails to refresh the list. You have to restart the application before it will load the dev

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Aaron Scheiner
Ubuntu 17.04 x64 : (4.6.4-839) I get this (which I also get from my own build - missing plugin. I confirmed my build isn't present when running "your" binary from the PPA) : qml: MapWidget.qml: cannot find a plugin named: googlemaps qrc:/MapWidget.qml:21: Error: Cannot assign [undefined] to QDecla

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Miika Turkia
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > So this is missing the QML modules for location and positioning. Obviously > this shouldn't crash. Equally obviously, I'd prefer if we figured out how to > install those automatically as dependencies. > > Any idea how to do the latter? Atta

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
So this is missing the QML modules for location and positioning. Obviously this shouldn't crash. Equally obviously, I'd prefer if we figured out how to install those automatically as dependencies. Any idea how to do the latter? Thanks for the report! /D On September 22, 2017 9:30:33 AM EDT, M

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Miika Turkia
I get a crash from subsurface installed from the PPA miika Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS (xenial) Subsurface v4.6.4-839, built with libdivecomputer v0.6.0-devel-Subsurface-branch (aa0b522ab86f06ef72dca30d1f9dc86c93f0b15c) Starting program: /usr/bin/subsurface [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
So for Ubuntu, the way to test "my" binaries is to follow the instructions at https://subsurface-divelog.org/download/ but to use the ppa:subsurface/subsurface-daily PPA: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:subsurface/subsurface-daily sudo apt-get update With

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Aaron Scheiner
Great :) I use Ubuntu 17.04 x64 as my primary OS, but I also have Windows 10 on a few machines and I run Subsurface mobile on Android 7 (Samsung Galaxy Note 7). Aaron On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:29:20PM +0200, Aaron Scheiner wrote: > > I ap

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:29:20PM +0200, Aaron Scheiner wrote: > I apologise in advance for this question: where are your builds located ? Don't apologize - this is one of those things you have to "just know", I guess... http://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/test/ > I'll happily test them. I'

Re: thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Aaron Scheiner
I apologise in advance for this question: where are your builds located ? I'll happily test them. I've been using my own so far. Thank you On 22 Sep 2017 12:24, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote: > As we start thinking about the next release (never mind that we still > haven't managed to get Subsurface-mobi

thinking about 4.7

2017-09-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel
As we start thinking about the next release (never mind that we still haven't managed to get Subsurface-mobile 2.0 out the door), one of my concerns is lack of testing of the binaries that I create. Right now I'm building Windows (that gets a decent amount of testing it seems), Mac (not as much),