The issues are with packaging on Launchpad so that this works for our users..
/D
On October 14, 2017 5:07:38 PM GMT-04:00, "Lubomir I. Ivanov"
wrote:
>On 14 October 2017 at 23:43, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>wrote:
>> On 14 October 2017 at 22:47, Dirk Hohndel
On 14 October 2017 at 23:43, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 14 October 2017 at 22:47, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>
>> Linux (the rest of our users, about 1/7): oh boy. No working Ubuntu build,
>> no working AppImage, Fedora and openSUSE appear ok
>>
>
> building
On 14 October 2017 at 23:55, Willem Ferguson
wrote:
> Lubomir, the newest default Qt with Xenial is 5.5. And I do not think the
> latest Subsurface build will work with such an old Qt. I have been looking
> at the build.sh to see if the location of Qt can be
Lubomir, the newest default Qt with Xenial is 5.5. And I do not think the
latest Subsurface build will work with such an old Qt. I have been looking
at the build.sh to see if the location of Qt can be changed, but I did not
see that this is possible. In addition, I have no way to download Qt 5.9
Hi,
> On 14. Oct 2017, at 21:47, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> - are there any major regressions / massive bugs that I have forgotten about
> and that should prevent us from releasing 4.7?
I have to admit I cannot say confidently there are none in the planner. I still
have to
On 14 October 2017 at 22:47, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> Linux (the rest of our users, about 1/7): oh boy. No working Ubuntu build, no
> working AppImage, Fedora and openSUSE appear ok
>
building on Ubuntu 16.04 was very easy - no issues even with the
google maps plugin.
i cannot
>From phone. I do not think I own the user manual, but I have until next
Saturday (21st) to look at the user manual. But having neither an Apimage
nor a stable Ubuntu master complicates things. Will F22 still run the
latest version ? Kind regards, Willem
On 14 Oct 2017 21:48, "Dirk Hohndel"
During our layover on the way to Bonaire Linus and I were talking about the
Subsurface release plans and he pointed out something painfully obvious. For
most questions that we get these days, we simply point people at the latest
test build. It's silly that we keep dragging our feet with a new
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Jan Mulder wrote:
>
> On 14-10-17 12:59, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:04:03PM +0200, Jan Mulder wrote:
>>>
>>> That was a useful tip, thanks Lubomir. Not out of the woods yet but an
>>> interesting observation:
>>>
>>>
On 14-10-17 12:59, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:04:03PM +0200, Jan Mulder wrote:
That was a useful tip, thanks Lubomir. Not out of the woods yet but an
interesting observation:
Kirigami.ApplicationWindow {
id: rootItem
title: "Subsurface-mobile"
}
gives same
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:04:03PM +0200, Jan Mulder wrote:
>
> That was a useful tip, thanks Lubomir. Not out of the woods yet but an
> interesting observation:
>
> Kirigami.ApplicationWindow {
> id: rootItem
> title: "Subsurface-mobile"
> }
>
> gives same problem, but
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo