The same name is always the same dive site as the other(s) with
the same name. If I edit a GPS fixes of a dive site, all occurrences
of that dive site are also changed because they are the same actually.
And now back to the messy
having-the-same-name-in-subsurface-means-nothing-as-they-might-
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:27:16AM -0300, Rodrigo Severo wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The autocompleted "Blue Corner - Create dive site w
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Rick Walsh wrote:
>
> I see the benefit of the autocomplete to create a new site with the same
> name as an existing site isn't so much that it saves a few keystrokes, but
> that it is explicitly either creating a new site or assigning a dive to an
> existing site
e in the world (case 2 above).
Really, autocomplete to just get the same (small and simple) name for
a new site is silly and confusing. Autocomplete should be restricted
to selecting an already existing dive site (which might already have
GPS coordinates or not).
Rodrigo Severo
__
tand
that having the MOD equal to some deco stop might seems less
confusing.
Truncating sounds more conservative but actually I bet that if your
dive plan gets unsafe because of half a meter on a deco stop or worst
half a foot you have other problems not rounding related so rounding
seems to me as
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rick Walsh wrote:
>
> I made a quick attempt this morning, but ran out of time and needed to
> go to work. I'm not familiar with rfcomm or Bluetooth on Linux.
> Please excuse my ignorance, but what is the correct command?
Hi,
I managed to get stable connections
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Willem Ferguson
wrote:
>
> These are real readings taken with accurate pressure sensors on both the
> oxygen and diluent cylinders. Is the real-life situation perhaps a bit
> different from the expected theoretical situation? You guys have the
> experience. Certainl
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Willem Ferguson
wrote:
>
> As far as the present implementation is concerned, I suspect it would be
> fairly easy (not simple) to to changes. We just need to agree on the
> principle of interpolation for the diluent.
I was initially proposing a method that would
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Paul Sargent wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct 2014, at 17:56, Rodrigo Severo wrote:
>
>>> For example: A one hour dive should be 20bar (60 litres) out of a standard 3
>>> litre cylinder - just calculating 1 litre a minute. That's just way off
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Paul Sargent wrote:
>
> Certainly for the moment I'd keep it simple. Personally I'd favour no
> numbers, rather than wrong ones, so I'd forget about computing constant rate
> O2 usage. It's just not that useful IMHO. It's too far removed from the
> amount of O2 I u
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> With the benefit of absolutely know subject matter expertize, I think what
> would make sense is to smooth out the depth graph. Something like a
> gliding average across one minute - that should remove jitter and the
> quick pop down to look
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Paul Sargent wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2014, at 03:42 PM, Rodrigo Severo
> wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> I agree: 1/2 foot is noise, 10 m is significant.
>
> What value do you think we should use as limit? I just proposed 1 m on
> my pre
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:37 PM, William Perry wrote:
>
> I just finished by CCR training down in Bonaire last week so I don’t have a
> lot of experience, but I did find that minor depth changes did not impact
> the loop volume enough for me to feel the need to add diluent. My inhale
> was cut
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Robert Helling wrote:
>
> On 27.10.2014, at 12:10, Rodrigo Severo wrote:
>
> Rodrigo,
>
>> AFAICT the consensus about diluent consumption is that it should be
>> calculated as if spend only during descends.
>>
>> In other
thod to calculate for OC, but consider
that during ascends and when maintaining depth the consumption is
zero. Distribute all consumption on descends taking in consideration
depths.
Regards,
Rodrigo Severo
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurfa
we do to
calculate SAC for OC. In other words, when depth is maintained or
reduced, we should consider diluent spend as zero, all use of diluent
happening on decends.
Regards,
Rodrigo
--
Rodrigo Severo | DIRETOR DE TECNOLOGIA
Tel. +55 61 3030-1515
Siga a Fábrica no twitter:@empautaclippi
16 matches
Mail list logo
