scritto:
Hi,
On 19 Mar 2015, at 18:30, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de mailto:tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
About the sensor: as a first idea we found
this:http://www.amsys.info/sheets/amsys.en.me501_d.e.pdf
May you have an other sensor from the sensor company
Martin,
Anton,
Am 19.03.2015 um 15:01 schrieb Martin Gysel:
Am 19.03.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Anton Lundin:
On 17 March, 2015 - Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) wrote:
.
.
.
I would be interested in such a device, even if they would be built as
one off jobs.
Only thing i would argue is really
Hi Martin,
We decided to follow Linus proposal, to implement a CLI.
Thank you for your hint.
Best
Tom
--
Thomas Schrein / Cell +49 162 4214947
(This email was sent by my smart phone)
--
Am 16.03.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Long, Martin mar...@longhome.co.uk:
I agree with Linus that UDDF
Robert,
Am 16.03.2015 um 17:35 schrieb Robert Helling:
Thomas,
On 16.03.2015, at 14:29, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de mailto:tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
The housing of oDiCo is made from plexiglas version 0.1 and filled
with silicon oel. The next housing 0.2 will be milled
Am 16.03.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
Because serial is running already we prefer to use a
already available protocol like the SeaBear, you've mentioned.
So while SeaBear is fairly simple
Am 17.03.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Dirk Hohndel:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:55 AM, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) tsx...@schrein.de
wrote:
My first idea was to emulate an existing dive computer, so subsurface would
work with no chances. But it is a lot of work to be copatible, I know. And we
want
Betreff: HighPressureLogger ... Re: Which protocol to implement on a
home brewed diving computer ?
Datum: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:58:09 +0100
Von:Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) tsx...@schrein.de
An: Robert Helling hell...@atdotde.de
Am 17.03.2015 um 11:48 schrieb Robert Helling:
Hi
.
Gabriel
On 12 Mar 2015 18:46, Thomas Schrein tho...@schrein.com
mailto:tho...@schrein.com wrote:
Hi list,
me and some friends are developing a DIY diving computer at the
moment.
See link (only in German at the moment):
http://www.skin-diver.org/sdiv/bastelecke/odico/
We
Robert,
Rick,
we are also very interested to have VPM running on a real diving
computer; that's one reason, we build our oDiCo project based on a
CORTEX M4 kernel, we are using a STM32F4, that has a build in FPU to
speed up floating point operations.
We think it is very important for divers
do you recommend us to implement into odico ?
One idea is UDDF/UDCF, is this a good approach ?
I also found some specs for the Suunto protocol and OSTC; is it better
to implement this ?
Other suggestions ?
I am very keen about your comments.
Thanx
Thomas Schrein
10 matches
Mail list logo