> I wasn't able to find an official reference for PADI, either.
According to PADI AOWD manual: bar/min or psi/min.
According to DSAT Tec: l/min.
Martin M.
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Remember, we always show the unit (l/min or cuft/min), so it's clear that SAC
> isn't a pressure drop.
Side note - In the mobile app, I see only "cuft", not "cuft/min".
Clearly, the numbers being shown are "cuft/min" - I
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Willem Ferguson
> wrote:
>
> On 18/07/2017 19:14, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely *everybody* knows what we mean by SAC rate. And the ones
>> that are offended by our use of standard terminology can be offended.
>>
>>
On 18/07/2017 19:14, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Absolutely *everybody* knows what we mean by SAC rate. And the ones
that are offended by our use of standard terminology can be offended.
It's their problem, not ours. Let's not take on their mental baggage.
Linus
Part of this
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Willem Ferguson <
willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za> wrote:
> This is in some ways a sensitive issue and maybe reflect existing
> discussion on this mail list that I am not aware of. The term "Surface Air
> Consumption" (SAC) is probably used wrongly most of the
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely *everybody* knows what we mean by SAC rate. And the ones
>> that are offended by our use of
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Absolutely *everybody* knows what we mean by SAC rate. And the ones
> that are offended by our use of standard terminology can be offended.
The takeaway here really is that even the people who have have
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Willem Ferguson
wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we at some stage get the terminology accurate and replace SAC in
> the UI throughout with RMV?
No, I really don't think so.
The scuba world has a lot of random terminology that may be
This is in some ways a sensitive issue and maybe reflect existing
discussion on this mail list that I am not aware of. The term "Surface
Air Consumption" (SAC) is probably used wrongly most of the time,
including by myself. This is because it is conflated with the
Respiratory Minute Volume