Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

Le 20/10/2017 à 17:01, Stefan Fuchs a écrit : Hi All, Am 20.10.2017 um 16:11 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: That's ugly. I found s.th. similar this morning also when deleting a cylinder but only in the merged dive I played with. Could come from my changes. I found already one bug and fixed it (

Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

Hi All,   Am 20.10.2017 um 16:11 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: > > That's ugly. I found s.th. similar this morning also when deleting > a cylinder but only in the merged dive I played with. > Could come from my changes. I found already one bug and fixed it > (see PRs) but that was not a

Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

Hi, Le 20/10/2017 à 15:57, Stefan Fuchs a écrit : Am 20.10.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Stefan Fuchs: Am 20.10.2017 um 12:17 schrieb Willem Ferguson: On 20/10/2017 11:19, Stefan Fuchs wrote: That's ugly. I found s.th. similar this morning also when deleting a cylinder but only in the merged dive I

Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

Am 20.10.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Stefan Fuchs: > Am 20.10.2017 um 12:17 schrieb Willem Ferguson: >> On 20/10/2017 11:19, Stefan Fuchs wrote: >>> That's ugly. I found s.th. similar this morning also when deleting a >>> cylinder but only in the merged dive I played with. >>> Could come from my changes.

Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

Am 20.10.2017 um 12:17 schrieb Willem Ferguson: > On 20/10/2017 11:19, Stefan Fuchs wrote: >> That's ugly. I found s.th. similar this morning also when deleting a >> cylinder but only in the merged dive I played with. >> Could come from my changes. I found already one bug and fixed it (see >> PRs)

Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

On 20/10/2017 11:19, Stefan Fuchs wrote: What exactly are you doing? Cause I can't reproduce it in the planner easily. Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Fuchs E-Mail: sfu...@gmx.de Of course there is no 4.6.3.1031. It is: 4.6.4.1031 Kind regards, wf -- This mess

Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

On 20/10/2017 11:19, Stefan Fuchs wrote: That's ugly. I found s.th. similar this morning also when deleting a cylinder but only in the merged dive I played with. Could come from my changes. I found already one bug and fixed it (see PRs) but that was not all - crash still there. Start Subsurfac

Re: Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

Hello Willem, Am 20.10.2017 um 10:37 schrieb Willem Ferguson: > V4.6.4-1031 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS > > In planner, enter more than one cylinder. Delete the second cylinder. > Crash. > That's ugly. I found s.th. similar this morning also when deleting a cylinder but only in the merged dive I played wi

Subsurface planner: Crash on delete cylinder

V4.6.4-1031 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS In planner, enter more than one cylinder. Delete the second cylinder. Crash. Kind regards, willem -- This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer. Please refer to http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf for full details.

Re: Subsurface planner

On 20 October 2017 at 12:22, Rick Walsh wrote: > > > On 16 October 2017 at 18:20, Willem Ferguson < > willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za> wrote: > >> >> Attached screenshot is 4.6.4.977, downloaded yesterday(Sunday). The VPM >> plan generates an impossible ceiling. Perhaps worth another look? >> >>

Re: Subsurface planner

On 16 October 2017 at 18:20, Willem Ferguson < willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za> wrote: > > Attached screenshot is 4.6.4.977, downloaded yesterday(Sunday). The VPM > plan generates an impossible ceiling. Perhaps worth another look? > > Thanks for this. Yes, that ceiling is not correct and I can rep

Re: Subsurface planner

On 16 Oct. 2017 7:11 pm, "Stefan Fuchs" wrote: Good morning! Good evening, Am 16.10.2017 um 09:20 schrieb Willem Ferguson: Rick, your mail is truly useful. Thank you. Comments in-line below: Attached screenshot is 4.6.4.977, downloaded yesterday(Sunday). When plan variations is activated, it

Re: Subsurface planner

Hi Willem, On 16 October 2017 at 16:32, Willem Ferguson < willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za> wrote: > Robert, Stefan, > > After your recent work on the planner, has anything changed in the planner > UI or the way it functions? I do not see anything but I can hardly think > that this could be the cas

Subsurface planner

Robert, Stefan, After your recent work on the planner, has anything changed in the planner UI or the way it functions? I do not see anything but I can hardly think that this could be the case after all your work. The planning using VPM-B is still pretty broken. The ceiling generated is just

Re: Fwd: Re: Quirks of Subsurface planner

>From my phone. That is good news, Robert. I am in the field, diving hopefully until the weekend. Cannot do or test much here. Will check next week. Thank you very much for your time. I appreciate it. Kind regards, willem On 23 Jan 2017 19:59, "Willem Ferguson" wrote: > > On 23/01/2017 18:50,

Re: Subsurface Planner: feature request

On 23 January, 2017 - Robert Helling wrote: > Hi, > > > On 21.01.2017, at 16:53, Anton Lundin wrote: > > > > I would love to see a simple way to switch between combinations of deco > > gases. Its quite a few times I'm wondering its it worth it to carry the > > 100%, 50% or what happens of we st

Fwd: Re: Quirks of Subsurface planner

On 23/01/2017 18:50, Robert Helling wrote: Willem, The change to the wrong gas that you initially reported I cannot reproduce and thus not work on. Can you reproduce that? What steps do I have to follow? Best Robert 1) Open the dive plan file for Thu Jan 19th in the XML file I sent. 2) Del

Subsurface Planner: feature request

Hi All, >>/Am 21.01.2017 um 13:28 schrieb Rick Walsh http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface>>: />>//>>/set the switch depth of the deco gas to either deeper than the max depth of the dive (so you never switch to it), or very shallow (0.1m, so it has negligible effe

Re: Quirks of Subsurface planner

On 22/01/2017 00:16, Robert Helling wrote: Willem, On 20 Jan 2017, at 07:42, Willem Ferguson > wrote: 4) I could not replicate it in this specific exercise, but in some cases when re-opening a dive for editing in the planner, the part of the dive wher

Re: Quirks of Subsurface planner

Willem, > On 20 Jan 2017, at 07:42, Willem Ferguson > wrote: > > 4) I could not replicate it in this specific exercise, but in some cases when > re-opening a dive for editing in the planner, the part of the dive where the > planner initially calculated the deco profile, (upon re-editing) come

Re: Subsurface Planner: feature request

On 21 January, 2017 - Robert C. Helling wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 21.01.2017 um 13:28 schrieb Rick Walsh : > > > > set the switch depth of the deco gas to either deeper than the max depth of > > the dive (so you never switch to it), or very shallow (0.1m, so it has > > negligible effect on the pla

Re: Subsurface Planner: feature request

Hi, > Am 21.01.2017 um 13:28 schrieb Rick Walsh : > > set the switch depth of the deco gas to either deeper than the max depth of > the dive (so you never switch to it), or very shallow (0.1m, so it has > negligible effect on the plan). Alternatively, you first plan the dive with all gases, sa

Re: Subsurface Planner: feature request

On 21 Jan 2017 10:42 PM, "Willem Ferguson" wrote: In planning it it required to consider the failure of a deco tank since this affects the safety margin required from gases in some of the other tanks. Therefore one would like to disable one of the tanks in the Available Gases table. Currently one

Subsurface Planner: feature request

In planning it it required to consider the failure of a deco tank since this affects the safety margin required from gases in some of the other tanks. Therefore one would like to disable one of the tanks in the Available Gases table. Currently one needs to delete the tank and then enter all the

Re: Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

> On 10 Feb 2016, at 17:27, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > >> On Feb 10, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Joakim Bygdell > > wrote: >>> >>> I am NOT INTERESTED in turning Subsurface-mobile into a replacement for >>> the desktop version. So no, I don't want to reimplement all the things t

Re: Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

> On Feb 10, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Joakim Bygdell wrote: >> >> I am NOT INTERESTED in turning Subsurface-mobile into a replacement for >> the desktop version. So no, I don't want to reimplement all the things that >> we >> have in the preferences on the desktop for the mobile device. > Nor should w

Re: Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

> On 10 Feb 2016, at 16:43, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > >> On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:46 PM, Joakim Bygdell > > wrote: >> >> With the first beta out I consider the functionality more or less frozen. >> I'll add the cylinder editing in the next beta, but other than that...? >

Re: Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

> On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:46 PM, Joakim Bygdell wrote: > > With the first beta out I consider the functionality more or less frozen. > I'll add the cylinder editing in the next beta, but other than that...? > Since we will have users coming directly to the mobile version we need to be > able to

Re: Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

On 9 February 2016 at 22:51, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 08:25:04AM +1100, Rick Walsh wrote: > > > A separate Subsurface-planner would be nice as well. Maybe something > > > simple, with just table based input and output, utilizing the powerful > deco

Re: Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 08:25:04AM +1100, Rick Walsh wrote: > > A separate Subsurface-planner would be nice as well. Maybe something > > simple, with just table based input and output, utilizing the powerful deco > > planner core that we have. > > I created the basics

Re: Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

g? That'll then be 3 mobile subsurface apps we >> > have, surely better to restrict the number of them and eventually (Even if >> > it's a while out) merge the functionality into a single app. >> >> The companion app goes away. Subsurface-mobile replaces that (even though

Subsurface-planner [was: Now Accepting GSoC 2016 Mentor Organization Applications]

; > it's a while out) merge the functionality into a single app. > > The companion app goes away. Subsurface-mobile replaces that (even though > that part of the functionality definitely needs a lot more testing). But > no, this would get us Subsurface-mobile and Subsurface-p

Subsurface Planner

Robert, I have just completed some deepaer dives where deco planning was pretty important. Two things about the planner would be extremely useful. A) the ability to leave a cylinder defined for the dive out of consideration. For instance if one uses an oxygen rich deco gas, what woukd the dive plan

Re: Fwd: Subsurface Planner

interface terrible. > Kind regards, willem > -- Forwarded message -- > From: willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za > Date: 22 Nov 2015 20:48 > Subject: Subsurface Planner > To: "Robert C. Helling" > Cc: > > Robert, I have just completed some deepaer