On 26 March, 2015 - Paul-Erik Törrönen wrote:
I wouldn't use a hp hose to connect the sensor with the 1st stage as it
increase the risk of failure. I think it's better to connect the sensor
to the hp port directly but place the rest of the electronic away from
it. so you can have a very
Hi
Am 26.03.2015 um 13:18 schrieb Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se:
But with something like:
https://www.divegearexpress.com/regulators/adapters_osi.shtml#3431
Holy cow, 64$. That would be a significant fraction of the logger's price.
Robert
___
On 17 March, 2015 - Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) wrote:
Betreff: HighPressureLogger ... Re: Which protocol to implement on a home
brewed diving computer ?
Datum:Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:58:09 +0100
Von: Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) tsx...@schrein.de
An: Robert Helling hell
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se wrote:
The problem comes when you try to use the second hp-port on a stage
bottle. That one is in a really exposed position:
http://dir-diver.com/en/equipment/reg_config_stages.html
I don't really know how to do something sane
Am 25.03.2015 um 14:18 schrieb Anton Lundin:
On 17 March, 2015 - Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) wrote:
Betreff: HighPressureLogger ... Re: Which protocol to implement on a home
brewed diving computer ?
Datum: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:58:09 +0100
Von: Thomas Schrein
Am 19.03.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Davide DB:
Is it so difficult to have a sensibly smaller sensor than today?
Theoretically speaking: If it is custom made, we can try optimize for a
small size. In principle the size depends
* on the parts that need to be covered by the housing (piezo-sensor,
On 17 March, 2015 - Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) wrote:
Robert,
Am 16.03.2015 um 17:35 schrieb Robert Helling:
Thomas,
On 16.03.2015, at 14:29, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de mailto:tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
The housing of oDiCo is made from plexiglas version 0.1 and
Am 19.03.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Anton Lundin:
On 17 March, 2015 - Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) wrote:
Robert,
Am 16.03.2015 um 17:35 schrieb Robert Helling:
Thomas,
On 16.03.2015, at 14:29, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de mailto:tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
The housing of
Martin,
Anton,
Am 19.03.2015 um 15:01 schrieb Martin Gysel:
Am 19.03.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Anton Lundin:
On 17 March, 2015 - Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) wrote:
.
.
.
I would be interested in such a device, even if they would be built as
one off jobs.
Only thing i would argue is really
Am 19.03.2015 um 20:09 schrieb Robert C. Helling:
Hi,
On 19 Mar 2015, at 18:30, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) tsx...@schrein.de
wrote:
About the sensor: as a first idea we found
this:http://www.amsys.info/sheets/amsys.en.me501_d.e.pdf
May you have an other sensor from the sensor
Hi Martin,
We decided to follow Linus proposal, to implement a CLI.
Thank you for your hint.
Best
Tom
--
Thomas Schrein / Cell +49 162 4214947
(This email was sent by my smart phone)
--
Am 16.03.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Long, Martin mar...@longhome.co.uk:
I agree with Linus that UDDF is the
Robert,
Am 16.03.2015 um 17:35 schrieb Robert Helling:
Thomas,
On 16.03.2015, at 14:29, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de mailto:tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
The housing of oDiCo is made from plexiglas version 0.1 and filled
with silicon oel. The next housing 0.2 will be milled
Am 16.03.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
Because serial is running already we prefer to use a
already available protocol like the SeaBear, you've mentioned.
So while SeaBear is fairly simple
Am 17.03.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Dirk Hohndel:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:55 AM, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) tsx...@schrein.de
wrote:
My first idea was to emulate an existing dive computer, so subsurface would
work with no chances. But it is a lot of work to be copatible, I know. And we
want to
Betreff: HighPressureLogger ... Re: Which protocol to implement on a
home brewed diving computer ?
Datum: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:58:09 +0100
Von:Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) tsx...@schrein.de
An: Robert Helling hell...@atdotde.de
Am 17.03.2015 um 11:48 schrieb Robert Helling:
Hi
On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:55 AM, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
My first idea was to emulate an existing dive computer, so subsurface would
work with no chances. But it is a lot of work to be copatible, I know. And we
want to concentrate to bring up the HW and basic SW
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:38:27PM +0100, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists) wrote:
Whow, great ... :-))
:-)
So I will do 2 things:
1. Start to spec and implement a protocol/command set based on Linus
proposal
2. Speed up prototyping our odico, so that I can give some sample to you the
next
Thanx guys,
for all the comments.
@Linus
We are using the USB-CDC package from ST for our STM32F4. It comes with
a driver for the PC that make a COM port, for linux it should work the
standard linux kernel !? At the moment it is ok for us, but I am looking
for a way to have the USB also work
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
@Linus
We are using the USB-CDC package from ST for our STM32F4. It comes with a
driver for the PC that make a COM port, for linux it should work the
standard linux kernel !? At the moment it is ok for us,
I agree with Linus that UDDF is the definition of bloated. Otoh it sees to be
the least common divisor if a lot of software in this sector.
If you do decide to go the UDDF route (and I strongly recommend you
don't), then get in touch with me. We're currently on a 'beta' version
of the UDDF
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Thomas Schrein (mailinglists)
tsx...@schrein.de wrote:
Because serial is running already we prefer to use a
already available protocol like the SeaBear, you've mentioned.
So while SeaBear is fairly simple (it's just a comma-separated file),
I don't think
Hi list,
me and some friends are developing a DIY diving computer at the moment.
See link (only in German at the moment):
http://www.skin-diver.org/sdiv/bastelecke/odico/
We intent to have it as a hardware platform for open source diving
software development. We are thinking to have it
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Robert C. Helling
rob...@euve10195.vserver.de wrote:
Why do you want to implement a serial protocol over USB? I think the choice
of others to present yourself as s flash drive to a usb host is quite
convenient. In the directory listing you can already
Hi,
This sounds like a fun project! I would love to see it in the real world. Let
me know when you are close to
Munich.
My suspicion is that for others to build it the main challenge is to make it
water tight. This while not making it too bulky.
Am 12.03.2015 um 18:40 schrieb Thomas
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Thomas Schrein tho...@schrein.com wrote:
So we have some questions:
Which protocol do you recommend us to implement into odico ?
As long as it's documented, it doesn't matter *that* much.
If it looks like a USB serial device, one thing that helps is if it
25 matches
Mail list logo
