On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Mel Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like an *excellent* plan to me! I'd be certainly glad to
participate and I'm sure will be the same for Tomeu. We can also
involve some Boston local activity authors to help out mentoring.
Great! So if Tomeu or any
Dear Masters of Joyride,
have built updated sugar rpms and they seem to work fine on last joyrides.
Built locally these rpms. Anybody sees any problem if I build them in
the OLPC-3 branch? Or should be in F9? Or F10 if we intend to switch
soon? What if we decide to do a 8.2.1 release?
= New requests =
Activity bundle icons in Journal aren't colored correctly
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8920
= Approved requests =
Control Panel needs to list wireless firmware version
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8131
CanvasRoundBox ignores border_color
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/3742
= New requests =
Activity bundle icons in Journal aren't colored correctly
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8920
= Approved requests =
Control Panel needs to list wireless firmware version
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8131
CanvasRoundBox ignores border_color
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/3742
Hi,
here are two patches to XoIRC:
0001-Fix-windows.patch
windows.py and widgets.py references each other, so windows cannot
use a constant from widgets in its method declaration.
0002-Emit-a-notification-when-someone-addresses-to-us-and.patch
Send a (very simple) notification when a message
Ahem, and here are the actual patches.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
here are two patches to XoIRC:
0001-Fix-windows.patch
windows.py and widgets.py references each other, so windows cannot
use a constant from widgets in its method declaration.
Hi Tomeu,
Tonight I'll apply your patches, thanks!
Ed.-
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahem, and here are the actual patches.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
here are two patches to XoIRC:
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Masters of Joyride,
have built updated sugar rpms and they seem to work fine on last joyrides.
Marco pointed me out in #sugar that work fine may need some
clarification. In fact, the following
With Milk?
No, thanks I take some sugar only.
The first part of our coffeetablish meeting will be to update everyone
about the current efforts. A lot of progress has been made on the icon
cache for example.
The second part will be to discuss the activity maintainers situation.
We really need
Nice. A good point about Thanksgiving week -- the converse is that
the week before is often midterms for students. But there are a
number of local activity developers (or would-be devs who haven't
finished their first!) that would be excited to join.
SJ
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Tomeu
Folks -
It would be helpful if we could stop referring to this as a conference -
it would make my life easier g. We should plan to use the time we have
some visitors in town to (a) have them do some presentations or sessions or
workshops and (b) focus quite seriously on the specific work that
Hello,
I wrote a quick script to generate a boot cd for a liveusb image with
overlay. It can be useful on old systems which doesn't support boot
from usb.
http://www.sugarlabs.org/~marco/livecd-iso-to-boot.sh
http://www.sugarlabs.org/~marco/boot.iso (for the latest sugar-spin.iso)
Marco
Hi,
Just wanted to ping the dev list regarding the current expected
8.2-767 behaviour for Mesh vs. AP use.
I now have 3 XOs here for testing all running 8.2-767, usually
trying** to keep all 3 attached to an AP I have here for internet
access. All 3 also have a blank jabber server set so
Hi,
Would anyone out there be interested in helping to develop a Google Desktop
ap for the purpose of promoting Sugar OS, which would simply present a
simulation of the Sugar UI, and allow people to move around and chat?
http://www.sugarlabs.org/go/Image:SugarChat.png
Alternatively, anyone know
Edubuntu held a IRC planning meeting that was well attended by Sugar.
As David VA pointed out in an earlier thread, Edubuntu has had a complicated
history. (who hasn't)
Hopefully, we can use some Sugar/Ubuntu SugarTeam/LTSP/Edubuntu synergy to
help reignite interest in Edubuntu. Much of the
On 05.11.2008, at 13:55, David Farning wrote:
.One sticking point was the availability of squeak on Ubuntu. If I
remember this issue was beaten to death before I got involved with SL.
I only remember discussion of getting it into Debian, not Ubuntu.
Basically, even though the license
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:18 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main,
and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in
it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable,
iirc. Its
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:18 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main,
and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in
it,
David: Yeah thats the one.
Vik: The edubuntu community is seeing how it can move the edubuntu
portion into universe, though that then limits support, as only main
and restricted get full support from ubuntu developers. It is
currently unsure what will go where, but edubuntu in universe means
more
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Mel Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like an *excellent* plan to me! I'd be certainly glad to
participate and I'm sure will be the same for Tomeu. We can also
involve some Boston local
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 20:18, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main,
and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in
it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable,
iirc. Its
Thanks Edward,
I see that you have cced Yoshiki and Robin. If they don't catch this
thread, I follow up with them.
thanks
david
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6,
I wasnt aware squeak was a firmware binary or a font...
No but seriously, that passage talks about just fonts.. not software
that uses wrongly licensed components, which is what squeak is
David
On 11/6/08, Luke Faraone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 20:18, David Van Assche
As of this summer, all of the code contained in our Squeak Etoys
version 4.0 is covered by either the Apache 2.0 or MIT Licenses.
-walter
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:04 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasnt aware squeak was a firmware binary or a font...
No but seriously, that
Hello,
1. The statement Walter quoted (As of this summer, all of the code
contained in our Squeak Etoys version 4.0 is covered by either
the Apache 2.0 or MIT Licenses.) is correct. Edward quoted the
email I sent around while ago. We have a license-clean Etoys
V. 4.0
25 matches
Mail list logo
