On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:49, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
A couple of points.
* This is a Sugar Labs organized conference, OLPC specific stuff is
not appropriate for it. XOcamp is in January. I edited the wiki
accordingly, both the talks and the schedule.
* Please don't do planning on the agenda during closed, in person
meetings. #sugar-meeting is the
Fellow Sugarites,
I must say that I'm pretty much surprised as to how the SugarCamp
planning is being done. My personal opinion is that SugarLabs is a
global organization and cannot behave as if it had headquarters in a
single place because it hasn't. SL contributors are going to travel
from
What about making Tuesday Content/Collaboration Day? I will be leaving
by early afternoon of Thursday... :-(
Ed Cherlin is coming, so that would make one more for Content Day, and
certainly I would be happy to tell you where OLE is at in that field,
and even discuss e-learning platforms and
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 01:27 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Am I the only to have missed this paper?
http://www.teachingmatters.org/evaluations/olpc_kappa.pdf
The bits about the Journal makes me think that it's really the right idea,
and it will rock as soon as we have a decent
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, talks that IMO are more appropriate for this week, along with
people I'm most interested in hearing, are:
- How Sugar-on-a-stick can better work for deployments such as the
ones carried on by http://schoolkey.net
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, talks that IMO are more appropriate for this week, along with
people I'm most interested in hearing, are:
- How Sugar-on-a-stick can better work for deployments such as the
ones carried on
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Fellow Sugarites,
I must say that I'm pretty much surprised as to how the SugarCamp
planning is being done. My personal opinion is that SugarLabs is a
global organization and cannot behave as if it had headquarters in a
single place because it hasn't. SL contributors are
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fellow Sugarites,
I must say that I'm pretty much surprised as to how the SugarCamp
planning is being done. My personal opinion is that SugarLabs is a
global organization and cannot behave as if it had headquarters in a
what the hell? i don't think it's productive to separate olpc and
sugarlabs in this fashion. the whole point of this was *joint*
discussion/planning!
and i also resent the implication that this was closed-door planning.
i posted a *proposed* schedule. we're discussing it here *in public*.
i
-1.
sugarlabs and olpc have the same mission. i think it's entirely
appropriate to have one day devoted to technical issues, with the
participation of olpc employees (who are also sugarlabs members --
even board members). we have monday, tuesday, friday, saturday, and
sunday reserved for
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:39 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1.
sugarlabs and olpc have the same mission.
Don't know about that, but even if that was true, both restaurants
below my flat have the same mission but I don't think their owners
need to take care of exactly the same
C. Scott Ananian wrote
snip
the whole point of this was *joint*
discussion/planning!
let's continue
*together*, shall we?
In this intention, I've added cross-links to each other activity in
XOCamp-2 and Sugarcamp
___
Sugar mailing list
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 20:39, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sugarlabs and olpc have the same mission.
Yes, but you have to substitute the word 'education' for 'laptop' -
I can't remember which way round :-)
(http://www.google.com/search?q=substitute+the+word+education+for+laptop)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:35 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what the hell? i don't think it's productive to separate olpc and
sugarlabs in this fashion.
Personally I think the way you keep to couple them is *extremely*
confusing. Red Hat people certainly participates to GNOME
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:35 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I think the way you keep to couple them is *extremely*
confusing. Red Hat people certainly participates to GNOME conferences,
but
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 20:39, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sugarlabs and olpc have the same mission.
Yes, but you have to substitute the word 'education' for 'laptop' -
I can't remember which way round :-)
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Setting us artificial us-vs-them antagonism between OLPC and
SugarLabs is *not* the way to improve our working together. In my
opinion. Both SugarLabs and OLPC are we.
There's a difference between us-vs-them antagonism and separation of
Hi Marco et al,
re:
I'd like to propose another one:
- How Sugar Labs could better work with OLPC in satisfying their
customers. (Greg Smith)
Marco
I'm open to it if there is interest and time available. I'd likely do an
open discussion with a few text only slides to focus, if that's
Sorry, the mail missed my sight. Please see the comments below:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Sameer Verma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two XOs (XO#1 and XO#2) with build 767. XO#1 is connected using
wvdial (pppd) over GPRS. I am using Vodafone's service in India. By
itself, XO#1 gets
I tried, it asked me for a password (no need, I'm good), but just let me
remind y'all that the _minimum_ design constraint for the laptop.org
page is that it shows right on the XO... The current one doesn't (or
didn't when I tried to show it to somebody, using an XO, a couple weeks
back.
Ar 13/11/2008 am 01:18, ysgrifennodd Brendan R. Powers:
Hi,
I did not mean to suggest ripping out telepathy and dbus, and replacing it
with xmlrpc. My thought on the subject was that dbus may not be well suited
for network communication because it's a binary protocol. The problem comes
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried, it asked me for a password (no need, I'm good), but just let me
remind y'all that the _minimum_ design constraint for the laptop.org page is
that it shows right on the XO... The current one doesn't (or didn't
Hello,
One of the things in my TODO for 9.1 is to have a better mechanism for
language packs[1] in the XO. The primary goal of language packs is to
decouple the process of translations from the process of OS release as
much as possible, since as our software gets larger and more
complicated, it
(from Werner Westermann, [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Best regards from Santiago, Chile.
In May of this year, we had exciting news where the ICT-Schools program of the
Department of Education, Enlaces (http://www.enlaces.cl), asked Educalibre
(http://www.educalibre.cl/) to propose a OLPC deployment
I suggest you approach Chuck Kane at OLPC directly. If for some reason
he cannot accommodate the request, then we should discuss alternative
means to deploy Sugar.
-walter
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(from Werner Westermann, [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marco et al,
re:
I'd like to propose another one:
- How Sugar Labs could better work with OLPC in satisfying their
customers. (Greg Smith)
Marco
I'm open to it if there is interest and time available. I'd
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... lots of interesting things...
I'm very happy that the Sugar folks are in town -- under whatever
alibi -- and I'm keen on meeting, having a beer together and perhaps
talking a few technical things too ;-) After all,
I hope for a chance to see a server in action, and it would be tops if I
could see a server being set up from scratch. That might even justify I
take a box with me...
In a Montessori way, I learn best when things happen as I do them.
Yama
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:07
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Please reserve the 3pm-5pm Thursday time slot for the roadmap meeting;
I've gotten people to clear their schedules for that slot already.
I've left it there, and split it in two parts:
15-17: Brainstorm: OLPC 9.1 draft roadmap and priorities
17-19 Brainstorm: Sugar
30 matches
Mail list logo
