On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:18 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main,
and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in
it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable,
iirc. Its
On 06.11.2008, at 00:12, David Farning wrote:
Do you know who I should talk to about requesting that
http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/
be update to reflect this information?
Squeak (at squeak.org) and Etoys (at vpri.org / squeakland.org) are
two different versions that were last
At Thu, 6 Nov 2008 00:53:11 -0800,
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 06.11.2008, at 00:12, David Farning wrote:
Do you know who I should talk to about requesting that
http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/
be update to reflect this information?
Squeak (at squeak.org) and Etoys (at
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:18 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main,
and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in
it,
Thanks Edward,
I see that you have cced Yoshiki and Robin. If they don't catch this
thread, I follow up with them.
thanks
david
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6,
As of this summer, all of the code contained in our Squeak Etoys
version 4.0 is covered by either the Apache 2.0 or MIT Licenses.
-walter
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:04 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasnt aware squeak was a firmware binary or a font...
No but seriously, that
6 matches
Mail list logo
