Ar 13/11/2008 am 01:18, ysgrifennodd Brendan R. Powers:
> Hi,
>
> I did not mean to suggest ripping out telepathy and dbus, and replacing it
> with xmlrpc. My thought on the subject was that dbus may not be well suited
> for network communication because it's a binary protocol. The problem comes
Hi,
I did not mean to suggest ripping out telepathy and dbus, and replacing it with
xmlrpc. My thought on the subject was that dbus may not be well suited for
network communication because it's a binary protocol. The problem comes in when
the application on the other side of the tube does not s
Bernie and I just took a look at the CIC spaces; they are beautiful. We're
using the same space for the Monday night hackathon (especially invited: new
contributors). I'll send out another email about that in a moment.
-Mel
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Bernie Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Walter is looking for another place for Thursday and Friday. We can
> probably use the Media Lab for the weekend.
Walter just confirmed another meeting room at CIC for Thu and Fri.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Robert McQueen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bernie, Brendan,
>
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> Brendan R. Powers wrote:
>>> I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit
>>> more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar t
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Switching to XMLRPC?! This seems like some massive sidestep which would
>> break the existing stuff as well as preventing any code sharing between
>> Telepathy apps on Sugar and Telepathy apps on any other Linux platforms.
Thanks Marco. Friday may also be a possibility for me, if that would be easier
to schedule.
Christian
_
From: Marco Pesenti Gritti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bernie Innocenti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: IAEP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sugar List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Christi
Hi Bernie, Brendan,
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Brendan R. Powers wrote:
>> I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit
>> more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function
>> more like a standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing
>> standards
Brendan R. Powers wrote:
> It would be great to talk about sugar in ltsp environments.
> I think that the jabber, and ltsp stuff are mostly 2
> different issues, although they have some things in common.
> I could put them both down on the wiki, and we could just
> talk about one after the other.
Brendan R. Powers wrote:
> I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit
> more standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function
> more like a standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing
> standards in place of some of the custom solutions used now (
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Brendan R. Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - "Tomeu Vizoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it's a good idea and would like to hear more about how we
>> could open Sugar up to higher levels of interoperability.
>>
>> I'm also quite curious about how
- "Tomeu Vizoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's a good idea and would like to hear more about how we
> could open Sugar up to higher levels of interoperability.
>
> I'm also quite curious about how Sugar runs in a LTSP environment and
> the challenges we can find there, so maybe Re
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more
>> standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more
> standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a
> standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standard
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more
> standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a
> standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standard
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christian Marc Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "IAEP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sugar List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 12:20:45 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Ca
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Christian Schmidt is interested to come and give a talk and hold a
> brainstorming session about UI. Saturday would work best for him, can
> we reserve a slot of the schedule for it?
Great! Please, update the list of proposals with these details.
--
// Bernie In
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Bernie Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mel, SJ and C.Scott: let's have a meeting tomorrow @ 2PM to partition the
> available time between Sugar talks, Sugar Labs marketing, OLPC employee
> meetings and the much anticipated Sugar hackathon.
Christian Schmidt
18 matches
Mail list logo
