On 7 Dec 2008, at 00:07, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> After having used the Journal for quite some time, I have some
> recommendations that I think would improve its usefulness.
> • Category view. I know that the idea of the Journal is to avoid
> the file-folder metaphor, but the ability to o
Okay, Colors! v11 supports Wacom tablets, with pressure sensitivity.
Instructions for setup are on the activity page, it's really pretty
simple.
OLPC folks, it might be nice to update xorg-dcon.conf to support Wacom
tablets, and to include the linuxwacom package in builds. I think
that deployment
After having used the Journal for quite some time, I have some
recommendations that I think would improve its usefulness.
1. *Category view*.* *I know that the idea of the Journal is to avoid the
file-folder metaphor, but the ability to organise activities into groups
would be very useful
On 6 Dec 2008, at 22:20, Eben Eliason wrote:
> That depends. I suppose we might be able to support some services,
> like backup, in interesting ways in non-school situations. I think the
> more appropriate course of action is to pursue the idea of the
> "collaboration server" as a unique device i
Hi all,
I'm going to add patch to remove "Register" button from sugar packages for
altlinux. Is there any reason to have it on non-XO machine ?
/Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/su
This issue is still unaddresed to the best of my knowledge.
2008/12/6 Simon Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:18:39 -0500
> "Sebastian Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I was surprised that our main UI metaphor - a CHILD, the center of
>> activities... a Symbol for Interacting
On 06.12.2008, at 17:49, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Add Fedora logo to Sugar
>
> This is, I think, a misunderstanding.
Yes it is. I set reply-to to OLPC-devel, this does not concern Suagr.
> Kim says "Sugar is supposed to
> include a fedora logo (they will provide), on
Tomeu -
Hi - thanks for bringing this up. Trac #8767 covers OLPC's agreement with
Red Hat regarding the identification of OLPC's XO bundled software. The
proposed identifications are to provide boot-time "Fedora remix" graphics on
the XO. It says nothing one way or the other about non-OLPC Suga
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:45, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Hm... we could have a link in the "about my XO" section that opens up a
> page
> > in browse that describes all the components that make up the starch
> stack.
> Sure, only I'm pretty sure this is not what RedHat had in mi
2008/12/6 Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> To put it succinctly, actually, fedora is a distribution of GNU+Linux,
>> a free operating system. Specifically, out of GNU+Linux, the "Linux"
>> bit represents less than 1%.
>
> This is more of a religious war as well as a matter of preference; RH ha
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:37, Simon Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:18:39 -0500
> "Sebastian Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was surprised that our main UI metaphor - a CHILD, the center of
> > activities... a Symbol for Interacting and Sharing... would be
> > res
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:26, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 2008/12/6 Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:05, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > wrote:
> > Uh, why?
> >
> > It is, after all, a installation of RedHat's _Fedora_ OS (albiet with
> OLP
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:18:39 -0500
"Sebastian Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was surprised that our main UI metaphor - a CHILD, the center of
> activities... a Symbol for Interacting and Sharing... would be
> restricted for our use as a community movement.
Personally I am very supprised tha
2008/12/6 Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:05, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Uh, why?
>
> It is, after all, a installation of RedHat's _Fedora_ OS (albiet with OLPC
> modifications).
To put it succinctly, actually, fedora is a distribution of GNU+Linux
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:05, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Perhaps "GNU" would be entirely more approprite (for the children).
>
Uh, why?
It is, after all, a installation of RedHat's _Fedora_ OS (albiet with OLPC
modifications).
-lf
___
Perhaps "GNU" would be entirely more approprite (for the children).
2008/12/6 Benjamin M. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Add Fedora logo to Sugar
>
> This is, I think, a misunderstanding. Kim says "Sugar is supposed to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Add Fedora logo to Sugar
This is, I think, a misunderstanding. Kim says "Sugar is supposed to
include a fedora logo (they will provide), on the home screen and in the
boot up text." If you look at the "Visibility Guidelines" do
I've been pondering how to put this forward. I have not the intention
of causing disruption, however I think this subject is very important.
I was surprised that our main UI metaphor - a CHILD, the center of
activities... a Symbol for Interacting and Sharing... would be
restricted for our use as a
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 15:34, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Eben#Tasks:
>
> Add Fedora logo to Sugar
> We've agreed to include the Fedora logo in our Sugar distributions.
> (Is this an OLPC agreement, or something SugarLabs should be doing in
> genera
>From http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Eben#Tasks:
Add Fedora logo to Sugar
We've agreed to include the Fedora logo in our Sugar distributions.
(Is this an OLPC agreement, or something SugarLabs should be doing in
general?) I've added some thoughts to the ticket (Trac #8767) , but
I'd like to get so
20 matches
Mail list logo
