[adding sugar-devel to cc]
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:17, OLPC Puno olpcp...@gmail.com wrote:
My name is Sdenka from Puno Peru, since one month we are using Debian at
Glorioso San Carlos High School in PERU. We installed the sugar and 10
activities including in Debian packages, then added
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 02:34:21PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
o The culprit appears to be a security setting in config/dbus that
prevents Xephyr from accessing the display. Does anybody know where
this setting is, and what it should say instead?
I've changed the wiki to remove Ubuntu Jaunty
Hi
I am getting the following message building olpcsound on openSUSE
Build Service. Without fix for this issue the packages built will not
get published. Could someone who knows what it means and what needs
fixing provide patch?
We are using Csound5.10.1
Thanks
Jigish
I: Statement might be
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
thanks for the reality check ;). Processing.js is probably overkill for
the simple stuff we need to do. It is easy to get distracted w/
high-quality animations when what we need are simple animations that are
very
I guess my brain was a tad outdated. So Sizzle is very cool, but
doesn't add anything if you're already using jQuery.
Hehe, hippies. And what are we?
2009/4/27 Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
thanks for the reality check ;).
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
I: Statement might be overflowing a buffer in strncat. Common mistake:
BAD: strncat(buffer,charptr,sizeof(buffer)) is wrong, it takes the
left over size as 3rd argument
GOOD:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:13PM +0530, Jigish Gohil wrote:
Hi
I am getting the following message building olpcsound on openSUSE
Build Service. Without fix for this issue the packages built will not
get published. Could someone who knows what it means and what needs
fixing provide patch?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:13PM +0530, Jigish Gohil wrote:
I am getting the following message building olpcsound on openSUSE
Build Service. Without fix for this issue the packages built will not
get published. Could someone who knows what it means
Crude Hack? I am sorry? I spent a few months last year producing
the olpcsound Fedora package, thanks very much. That is no hack.
It is true we have decided at the Fedora end of things to move back
to full Csound as Sugar is not locked into the XO. Paul Robinson
was taking care of producing a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:02:16PM +0100, victor.lazzar...@nuim.ie wrote:
Crude Hack? I am sorry? I spent a few months last year producing
the olpcsound Fedora package, thanks very much. That is no hack.
No _I_ am sorry. And apologize for my bogus
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kinderbetriebssystem-Sugar-auf-USB-Stick--/meldung/136853
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
No worries ;)
- Original Message -
From: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
Date: Monday, April 27, 2009 2:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Compiler warnings building olpcsound
To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at
===Sugar Digest ===
1. A teacher in Uruguay, Rosamel Ramirez, initiated a discussion on
the Sur list (http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-April/003166.html)
this weekend about her frustration with the volume of technical
discussion and the dearth of education discussion on the list.
I'm not clear on the nature of your problem. I have no difficulty
running a SoaS image in kvm (apart from broken Activities).
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Getting_Involved/Testing/Soas2-200904231400
I just now confirmed that it runs in Jaunty. I will add details to the
page as
Another semi-blocker of Sugar in Ubuntu Jaunty, is that
python-hulahop still contains Python 2.5
modules, but Python 2.6 is default in Jaunty's package which makes
Browse not start.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-hulahop/+bug/364871
2009/4/27 Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com:
Oops, I guess you were talking about Soas, not ubuntu jaunty packaged Sugar.
2009/4/27 Eduardo H. Silva hoboprim...@gmail.com:
Another semi-blocker of Sugar in Ubuntu Jaunty, is that
python-hulahop still contains Python 2.5
modules, but Python 2.6 is default in Jaunty's package which makes
So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, I have the troubles referred to by Sascha with jhbuild on Jaunty.
-walter
On
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
SoaS works for me.
Martin
pgpCm4Y72lxgP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Since the problem of running Sugar native in Jaunty is xephyr dbus policy
and hulahop inevitable out-of synchness with xpcom (as far as I can see from
the reporting) is it possible for the Ubuntu packaging gurus to provide a
ppa that can be added temporarily to the repository list and have fixed
In Windows Vista32, I found that LiveUSB-creator 3.6.5 reported success in
creating a Sugar Stick from Soas2-200904231400.iso, but the image failed to
boot.
In Ubuntu 9.04 (Jackalope64) I then tried Sebastien's livecd-iso-to-disk.sh
script from 09 April 2009 (
I have annotated the format of the Epaath lessons we have created here
in Nepal for the sugar subproject Karma
Please check it out:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Karma:Anatomy_of_a_Karma_Lesson
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:32:34PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
I'm not clear on the nature of your problem.
When running Ubuntu Jaunty _within_ KVM (i.e. as a guest, not as a host)
the X server does not work, at least if the vesa emulation option is
used (to get screen resolutions 1024x768
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martin Dengler
mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
SoaS works for me.
Thank you. That makes much more sense now.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:32:34PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
I'm not clear on the nature of your problem.
When running Ubuntu Jaunty _within_ KVM (i.e. as a
24 matches
Mail list logo
