On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:44:10PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martin Dengler
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> >> So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
> >> different ways. Not good. What
Thank you. That makes much more sense now.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:32:34PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>
>> I'm not clear on the nature of your problem.
>
> When running Ubuntu Jaunty _within_ KVM (i.e. as a guest, not as a host) the
> X
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martin Dengler
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>> So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
>> different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
>
> SoaS works for me.
Yes, SoaS Beta, I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:32:34PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
I'm not clear on the nature of your problem.
When running Ubuntu Jaunty _within_ KVM (i.e. as a guest, not as a host)
the X server does not work, at least if the "vesa" emulation option is
used (to get screen resolutions > 1024x76
I have annotated the format of the Epaath lessons we have created here
in Nepal for the sugar subproject Karma
Please check it out:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Karma:Anatomy_of_a_Karma_Lesson
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
___
In Windows Vista32, I found that LiveUSB-creator 3.6.5 reported success in
creating a Sugar Stick from Soas2-200904231400.iso, but the image failed to
boot.
In Ubuntu 9.04 (Jackalope64) I then tried Sebastien's livecd-iso-to-disk.sh
script from 09 April 2009 (
http://people.sugarlabs.org/sdz/livec
Since the problem of running Sugar native in Jaunty is xephyr dbus policy
and hulahop inevitable out-of synchness with xpcom (as far as I can see from
the reporting) is it possible for the Ubuntu packaging gurus to provide a
ppa that can be added temporarily to the repository list and have fixed
pa
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
> different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
SoaS works for me.
Martin
pgpCm4Y72lxgP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> FWIW, I have the troubles referred to by Sascha with jhbuild on Jaunty.
>
> -walter
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at
Oops, I guess you were talking about Soas, not ubuntu jaunty packaged Sugar.
2009/4/27 Eduardo H. Silva :
> Another semi-blocker of Sugar in Ubuntu Jaunty, is that
> "python-hulahop still contains Python 2.5
> modules, but Python 2.6 is default in Jaunty's package" which makes
> Browse not start.
Another semi-blocker of Sugar in Ubuntu Jaunty, is that
"python-hulahop still contains Python 2.5
modules, but Python 2.6 is default in Jaunty's package" which makes
Browse not start.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-hulahop/+bug/364871
2009/4/27 Edward Cherlin :
> I'm not clear on
I'm not clear on the nature of your problem. I have no difficulty
running a SoaS image in kvm (apart from broken Activities).
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Getting_Involved/Testing/Soas2-200904231400
I just now confirmed that it runs in Jaunty. I will add details to the
page as so
===Sugar Digest ===
1. A teacher in Uruguay, Rosamel Ramirez, initiated a discussion on
the Sur list (http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-April/003166.html)
this weekend about her frustration with the volume of technical
discussion and the dearth of education discussion on the list. Se
No worries ;)
- Original Message -
From: Jonas Smedegaard
Date: Monday, April 27, 2009 2:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Compiler warnings building olpcsound
To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:02:16PM +01
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kinderbetriebssystem-Sugar-auf-USB-Stick--/meldung/136853
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:02:16PM +0100, victor.lazzar...@nuim.ie wrote:
>Crude Hack? I am sorry? I spent a few months last year producing
>the olpcsound Fedora package, thanks very much. That is no hack.
No _I_ am sorry. And apologize for my bogus
Crude Hack? I am sorry? I spent a few months last year producing
the olpcsound Fedora package, thanks very much. That is no hack.
It is true we have decided at the Fedora end of things to move back
to full Csound as Sugar is not locked into the XO. Paul Robinson
was taking care of producing a 5.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:13PM +0530, Jigish Gohil wrote:
>I am getting the following message building olpcsound on openSUSE
>Build Service. Without fix for this issue the packages built will not
>get published. Could someone who knows what it mean
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>
>> I: Statement might be overflowing a buffer in strncat. Common mistake:
>> BAD: strncat(buffer,charptr,sizeof(buffer)) is wrong, it takes the
>> left over size as 3rd argument
>> GOOD: strncat(buffer,charptr,sizeof(buffer)-strlen(buffer)-1)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:13PM +0530, Jigish Gohil wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am getting the following message building olpcsound on openSUSE
> Build Service. Without fix for this issue the packages built will not
> get published. Could someone who knows what it means and what needs
> fixing provide pa
I guess my brain was a tad outdated. So Sizzle is very cool, but
doesn't add anything if you're already using jQuery.
Hehe, hippies. And what are we?
2009/4/27 Ties Stuij :
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Bryan Berry wrote:
>> thanks for the reality check ;). Processing.js is probably overki
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Bryan Berry wrote:
> thanks for the reality check ;). Processing.js is probably overkill for
> the simple stuff we need to do. It is easy to get distracted w/
> high-quality animations when what we need are simple animations that are
> very responsive to the user.
Hi
I am getting the following message building olpcsound on openSUSE
Build Service. Without fix for this issue the packages built will not
get published. Could someone who knows what it means and what needs
fixing provide patch?
We are using Csound5.10.1
Thanks
Jigish
I: Statement might be ove
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 02:34:21PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
o The culprit appears to be a security setting in config/dbus that
prevents Xephyr from accessing the display. Does anybody know where
this setting is, and what it should say instead?
I've changed the wiki to remove Ubuntu Jaunty fr
[adding sugar-devel to cc]
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:17, OLPC Puno wrote:
> My name is Sdenka from Puno Peru, since one month we are using Debian at
> Glorioso San Carlos High School in PERU. We installed the sugar and 10
> activities including in Debian packages, then added ETOYS, SCRATCH AND
>
25 matches
Mail list logo