El Fri, 18-09-2009 a las 16:27 -0400, Chris Ball escribió:
> Please volunteer by replying to this mail if you're interested, and
> please do so by Thursday September 24th so that we can run the vote
> at the Friday September 25th SLOBs meeting.
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunte
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti :
> I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
> like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things (SL
should promote SoaS, SL should treat distributors equally).
The 3rd, about naming,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:47, Daniel Drake wrote:
> 2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti :
>> I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
>> like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
>
> I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things (SL
> should promote SoaS, S
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 03:24:23AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:49:00PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
2. manually sync /debian from git.debian.org to git.gnewsense.org
3. do final work in git.gnewsense.org
Is Alioth such a cruel place to work together? Is it me - am
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
> "Sugar on a Stick" and each individual team and product "Fedora Sugar
> on a Stick", "OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick", etc.
+1
Though you neglected to mention Debian
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
> So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
> "Sugar on a Stick" and each individual team and product "Fedora Sugar
> on a Stick", "OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick", etc. From time to time SLs
> would decide to call and market as "Sugar on a Stick" a par
> So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
> "Sugar on a Stick" and each individual team and product "Fedora Sugar
> on a Stick", "OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick", etc. From time to time SLs
> would decide to call and market as "Sugar on a Stick" a particular
> release of a p
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
>> So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
>> "Sugar on a Stick" and each individual team and product "Fedora Sugar
>> on a Stick", "OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick", etc. From time to time SLs
>> would decide to call and market as "Sugar on a Stic
> But the idea is for SLs to market only "Sugar on a Stick", whatever it
> is based on.
>
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:24:42 Tomeu V
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
>> But the idea is for SLs to market only "Sugar on a Stick", whatever it
>> is based on.
>>
>
> Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
> customers.
Right, that's why the longer names such as "Debian Sugar on a Stick"
would refer to teams an
> I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
> Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
> issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
> unanswered questions, present and future?
>
I sympathize since I'm also a bit confused. This is
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
>> I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
>> Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
>> issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
>> unanswered questions, present and future?
>>
>
> I sympathize sinc
[forwarding to list]
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 21:34, Lucian Branescu
wrote:
> Just in case anyone googles for this, it's a weird behaviour of gtk.
>
> Solution here http://www.daa.com.au/pipermail/pygtk/2009-February/016593.html
>
> 2009/9/19 Lucian Branescu :
>> I'm not sure how to explicitly set
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:34:51 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> 2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
> >> But the idea is for SLs to market only "Sugar on a Stick", whatever it
> >> is based on.
> >
> > Exactly. So what it is base
It makes a difference with the current sharing of
activities since various combinations of OS and
Sugar versions don't work on the XO-1.
With a number of XO-1 systems running 767 and 802,
I've been able to share activities 767<->767 and
802<->802 but no luck 767<->802. Some of the issue
may not b
Hi Chris,
On 20 Sep 2009, at 15:29, Chris Marshall wrote:
> It makes a difference with the current sharing of
> activities since various combinations of OS and
> Sugar versions don't work on the XO-1.
>
> With a number of XO-1 systems running 767 and 802,
> I've been able to share activities 767<
El Sun, 20-09-2009 a las 09:33 -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka escribió:
> Because of my ignorant ways in interpreting things, which I trust is
> also the way of the populace :-), I think the wisest thing is to keep
> the SOaS moniker as a basic SLs thing, of course, of course
> recognizing Sebastian. I
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4209
Sugar Platform:
from 0.82 to 0.84
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/version/29255
Release notes:
Some minor updates were made based on some user feedback:
- moved the Play and Next buttons further from the edge.
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4026
Sugar Platform:
from 0.82 to 0.86
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/version/29254
Release notes:
New lesson editor: Now you can edit the lesson content inside the activity, and
transfer lessons to and from the J
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 03:24:23AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:49:00PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. manually sync /debian from git.debian.org to git.gnewsense.org
>>> 3. do final work in git.gn
Philippe Clérié wrote:
>> I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
>> Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
>> issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
>> unanswered questions, present and future?
>>
>
> I sympathize since I'
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>.
> So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
> "Sugar on a Stick" and each individual team and product "Fedora Sugar
> on a Stick", "OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick", etc. From time to time SLs
> would decide to call a
> I can understand why a teacher may not be interested in this discussion.
> Still, the debate is also very relevant. It's about how we're going to
> address your aunt's concerns.
The debate is definitely very relevant, and I'm glad we're having it.
> Think of it this way: nobody wants to know ho
There's a lot going on in this thread, so here is my attempt to
summarize discussions so far. If I've missed or misstated anything, my
apologies - and it's a wiki, so go fix it. ;-)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugar_on_a_Stick
By my count, there are 4 things we need to decide on and then ex
24 matches
Mail list logo
