I have tested firefox 3.5 and 3.6 on the XO with Sugar version
sugar-0.81.7-1.
I see significant distortion of png images
I also had this issue w/ os10 (0.84? 0.86?)
http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/XO-1/builds/OS10/
http://trac.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1689/firefox-3-6-blur1.png
http://t
Dave Bauer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Thomas C Gilliard <
satel...@bendbroadband.com> wrote:
Jim;
I want to my 2 cents to this. Here is a brief history as I remember it:
I have done a lot of testing of collaboration using the (default)
jabber.sugarlabs.org connection.
It
We have 10 trainees plus myself. I will try and test as you say... I suspect
the critical number is one more than the number you tested before the
workshop and one less than the number of participants in the workshop! :)
Sharing works as expected on simple mesh so I guess it is something to do
wi
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:07, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> I think we are looking at a great probortunity here. We have a project
My mind balks at that word, but I agree with this message wholeheartedly.
> If we are able to learn to make succe
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, David Leeming
wrote:
> I am finding that the XOs that have joined the Write activity can see and
> collaborate reliably. However, they cannot save it. Either one gets a “Keep
> error” or the saved text in the journal opens up with a blank page.
What number of XOs
I am running an OLPC workshop in Tuvalu with education officers and
teachers. We all have XO-1s and a server 0.6.
I have run into a possible bug with Write Activity (version 60). I have been
sharing Write with the class and want them to join, and then name and save,
and be able to start the wo
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 02:58:46PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:30:16PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> > The idea I had in mind is "implicit place for implicit save(on every
> > activity deactivation) and explicit place(journal) for explicit
> > save(Stop or Keep buttons
Thomas,
I did notice this morning that most of the 20 users I was seeing in my
Neighborhood has EXACTLY the same colors. They may well be the ghost
users you speak of.
I don't know if Gadget is the issue, but I do know that with .82
running on F10 I can't connect to JSLO, or rather I can but the
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Thomas C Gilliard <
satel...@bendbroadband.com> wrote:
> Jim;
>
> I want to my 2 cents to this. Here is a brief history as I remember it:
>
> I have done a lot of testing of collaboration using the (default)
> jabber.sugarlabs.org connection.
>
> It is provided b
Thanks Gary, I'll have a look at this. I'm worried that conducting tests
with novice users might be inconclusive, given that we are testing
schoolchildren. But I am also not an educator. I'd be happy to work with
someone with an educational background to put something together that might
be suitabl
Jim;
I want to my 2 cents to this. Here is a brief history as I remember it:
I have done a lot of testing of collaboration using the (default)
jabber.sugarlabs.org connection.
It is provided by caroline's solutiongrove.com and maintained by Dave
Bauer (daveb) .
Several months ago the jabbe
Hi Christian,
On 23 Jan 2010, at 15:01, Christian Marc Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> For our meeting at 10:30pm EST today, I put together a draft of a test
> protocol (in email body below). Please look it over and feel free to edit or
> add to. Thanks,
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Sugar Home View C
Sascha,
I tried a few things on F11 this morning, none of which worked:
I tried building sugar-jhbuild on a second Linux user id, and after
that running sugar-jhbuild run on two different Linux user ids at the
same time with the Jabber server in each set to an empty string. They
could not see ea
On 25 Jan 2010, at 12:01, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across the following:
>
> There is an option to delete an entry in the Journal entry palette and
> one in the detail section of an entry. This entry is as well available
> when an activity is running. Currently when you delete
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:30:16PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
The idea I had in mind is "implicit place for implicit save(on every
activity deactivation) and explicit place(journal) for explicit
save(Stop or Keep buttons in activity)"
It seems I still don't understand what you mean. Can you pleas
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:08:47AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
But following up on Sascha's suggestion, if we need to (1) notify the
activity to do a save when the delete occurs and don't save except on
changes, then any subsequent changes would presumably be an
intentional override by the user.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:30:40PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:01:22PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I came across the following:
> >
> > There is an option to delete an entry in the Journal entry palette and
> > one in the detail section of an entry.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:01:22PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I came across the following:
>>
>> There is an option to delete an entry in the Journal entry palette and
>> one in the detail section of an entry. This entry is as
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:30:40PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
In my mind problem here is not with deletion(in mind it should just
work, delete entry w/o any popups and inactive modes) but with
workflow
when activities write to journal on every deactivation.
I disagree. Having the activities sav
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:01:22PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across the following:
>
> There is an option to delete an entry in the Journal entry palette and
> one in the detail section of an entry. This entry is as well available
> when an activity is running. Currently w
Hi,
I came across the following:
There is an option to delete an entry in the Journal entry palette and
one in the detail section of an entry. This entry is as well available
when an activity is running. Currently when you delete an entry of a
running activity the entry gets recreated when clo
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:45:55PM -0600, Jim Simmons wrote:
When I tried the same exact thing on F11 I was not able to get the two
instances of Sugar running on two different Linux user ids to see each
other.
Do you have avahi-daemon running there? If so, can you upload enable all
debugging di
22 matches
Mail list logo
